From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752427AbZIAA3Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:29:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752301AbZIAA3Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:29:24 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:39525 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752231AbZIAA3X (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:29:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4A9C6ADF.2020707@goop.org> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:29:19 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Xiao Guangrong , Andrew Morton , Rusty Russell , Jens Axboe , Xiao Guangrong , LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: reuse the boot-time mappings of fixed_addresses References: <4A90AADE.20307@gmail.com> <20090829110046.GA6812@elte.hu> <4A997088.60908@zytor.com> <20090831082632.GB15619@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090831082632.GB15619@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.97a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/31/09 01:26, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> I'm wondering, how much space do we save this way, on a typical bootup >>> on a typical PC? >>> >>> >> Not a huge lot... a few dozen pages. >> > I guess it's still worth doing - what do you think? > It hardly seems worth it, but I guess it isn't much code. Will having an apparent overlap of vmalloc and fixmap spaces confuse anything? J