public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Norbert van Bolhuis <nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PROBLEM: CONFIG_NO_HZ could cause software timeouts
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:50:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9F9F64.5080305@aimvalley.nl> (raw)


The problem occurs when e.g. drivers use time_after(jiffes, timeout).

CONFIG_NO_HZ could make jiffies advance by more than 1.
This is done by: tick_nohz_update_jiffies->tick_do_update_jiffies64->do_timer

If drivers use a timeout value of jiffies+1,
"time_after(jiffies, timeout)" will be true after 1 interrupt
(given that it advances jiffies by at least 2).

This is exactly what happens in cfi_cmdset_0002.c:do_write_buffer
for our case (Powerpc MPC8313, linux-2.6.28, CONFIG_HZ=250, CONFIG_NO_HZ=y).

do_write_buffer does the following:
  unsigned long uWriteTimeout = ( HZ / 1000 ) + 1;
  ...
  timeo = jiffies + uWriteTimeout;
  ...
  for (;;) {
   ...
   if (time_after(jiffies, timeo) && !chip_ready(map, adr))
    break;
   if (chip_ready(map, adr)) {
    xip_enable(map, chip, adr);
    goto op_done;
   }
   UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1);
  }
  /* software timeout */
  ret = -EIO;
opdone:
  ...

I've seen a few software timeouts after the for-loop
looped only 13 times (= 13 us delay, i.s.o. the expected 1 ms). Typically
our NOR flash (S29GL01GP) may need upto ~ 200 us to be ready.

disabling CONFIG_NO_HZ fixes the problem.
replacing time_after by a for-loop counter to loop max 1000 times
also fixes the problem.

the latest kernel seems to have the same problem.

do I miss something here or is this a known problem of CONFIG_NO_HZ ?

             reply	other threads:[~2009-09-03 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-03 10:50 Norbert van Bolhuis [this message]
2009-09-03 11:22 ` PROBLEM: CONFIG_NO_HZ could cause software timeouts Corrado Zoccolo
2009-09-03 11:59   ` Norbert van Bolhuis
2009-09-05 18:19 ` Marcin Slusarz
2009-09-06  5:58   ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-06 10:11     ` Marcin Slusarz
2009-09-06  5:27 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A9F9F64.5080305@aimvalley.nl \
    --to=nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox