public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/i386: make sure stack-protector segment base is cache aligned
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:31:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA035C0.9070202@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA03016.8000904@gmail.com>

On 09/03/09 14:07, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I was referring to .data.percpu alignement requirements, not to false sharing.
>   

Yes, I know.  But the intent of DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED is to
avoid false sharing, and so it does no alignment when CONFIG_SMP isn't
enabled.  We need alignment regardless.

> When we put a object with an align(64) requirement into a section, linker
> has to put this 2**6 alignment in resulting section.
>
> When several .o are linked together, linker has to take the biggest alignement,
> and has to put holes.
>
> Check .data.percpu size in vmlinux before and after your patch, to make sure
> it doesnt grow too much :)
>
> therefore, ____cacheline_aligned objects should be placed in
> .data.percpu.shared_aligned
>   

That section doesn't exist without SMP.  (Well,
PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED_SECTION isn't defined.)

Anyway, this should sort it out.

    J

>From 69022dd952e65608afe33372e902b41cb94ff126 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 14:17:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86/32: put aligned stack-canary in percpu shared_aligned section

Pack aligned things together into a special section to minimize padding
holes.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index e597ecc..ac7e796 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ struct stack_canary {
 	char __pad[20];		/* canary at %gs:20 */
 	unsigned long canary;
 };
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct stack_canary, stack_canary) ____cacheline_aligned;
+DECLARE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct stack_canary, stack_canary);
 #endif
 #endif	/* X86_64 */
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index e338b5c..1e8181c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct orig_ist, orig_ist);
 #else	/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct stack_canary, stack_canary) ____cacheline_aligned;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct stack_canary, stack_canary);
 #endif
 
 /* Make sure %fs and %gs are initialized properly in idle threads */
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/percpu.h b/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
index aa00800..90079c3 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
@@ -81,14 +81,17 @@ extern void setup_per_cpu_areas(void);
 
 #ifdef MODULE
 #define PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED_SECTION ""
+#define PER_CPU_ALIGNED_SECTION ""
 #else
 #define PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED_SECTION ".shared_aligned"
+#define PER_CPU_ALIGNED_SECTION ".shared_aligned"
 #endif
 #define PER_CPU_FIRST_SECTION ".first"
 
 #else
 
 #define PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED_SECTION ""
+#define PER_CPU_ALIGNED_SECTION ".shared_aligned"
 #define PER_CPU_FIRST_SECTION ""
 
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-defs.h b/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
index 68438e1..3058cf9 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
@@ -66,6 +66,14 @@
 	DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED_SECTION) \
 	____cacheline_aligned_in_smp
 
+#define DECLARE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(type, name)				\
+	DECLARE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, PER_CPU_ALIGNED_SECTION)	\
+	____cacheline_aligned
+
+#define DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(type, name)				\
+	DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, PER_CPU_ALIGNED_SECTION)	\
+	____cacheline_aligned
+
 /*
  * Declaration/definition used for per-CPU variables that must be page aligned.
  */



  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-03 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-03 19:27 [PATCH] x86/i386: make sure stack-protector segment base is cache aligned Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-03 19:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 20:41   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-03 21:07     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 21:31       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-09-04  7:58         ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/i386: Put aligned stack-canary in percpu shared_aligned section tip-bot for Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-03 20:03 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/i386: Make sure stack-protector segment base is cache aligned tip-bot for Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-03 20:26   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-03 20:45     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-03 21:15       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-03 21:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-03 21:21           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04 14:15           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-04 15:59             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-04 16:06             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-03 21:28         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-04  2:51         ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-04  2:59           ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-04  3:35             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04  3:47               ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-04  3:51                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04  5:06                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-04  5:12                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 16:04                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-04 16:09                       ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-04 16:13                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04 16:01               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-04 16:52                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04 16:57                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AA035C0.9070202@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox