From: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
jmorris@namei.org, pekkas@netcore.fi, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv4: fix do_ip_setsockopt optlen check for IP_MULTICAST_IF
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:15:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB1FE2A.1060906@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253164784-15789-1-git-send-email-dfeng@redhat.com>
Xiaotian Feng wrote, at 09/17/2009 01:19 PM:
> Due to man page of setsockopt, if optlen is not valid, kernel should return
> -EINVAL. But a simple testcase as following, errno is 0, which means setsockopt
> is successful.
>
> addr.s_addr = inet_addr("192.1.2.3");
> setsockopt(s, IPPROTO_IP, IP_MULTICAST_IF, &addr, 1);
> printf("errno is %d\n", errno);
>
> This patch fixes the optlen check part, with the patch, we got errno EINVAL.
>
I also think it's a bug, the freebsd also does the optlen check.
But the style should be coincident with other option: firstly check the
availability of optlen, then copy option value from user and deal with it.
How about this one:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index fc7993e..5a06935 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
* Check the arguments are allowable
*/
+ if (optlen < sizeof(struct in_addr))
+ goto e_inval;
+
err = -EFAULT;
if (optlen >= sizeof(struct ip_mreqn)) {
if (copy_from_user(&mreq, optval, sizeof(mreq)))
Best Regards
-----
Shan Wei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 5:19 [PATCH 1/2] ipv4: fix do_ip_setsockopt optlen check for IP_MULTICAST_IF Xiaotian Feng
2009-09-17 9:15 ` Shan Wei [this message]
2009-09-22 20:38 ` David Miller
2009-09-23 1:41 ` Shan Wei
2009-09-24 22:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AB1FE2A.1060906@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dfeng@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox