From: "Graham, David" <david.graham@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>,
"e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.30+] e100 sometimes causes oops during resume
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:42:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB29F4A.3030102@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909170118.53965.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm getting following oops sometimes during resume on my Thinkpad T21
>> (where "sometimes" means about 10/1 good/bad ratio):
>>
>> ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020
>
> Well, this only tells you that an attempt to make order 5 allocation failed,
> which is not unusual at all.
>
> Allocations of this order are quite likely to fail if memory is fragmented,
> the probability of which rises with the number of suspend-resume cycles already
> carried out.
>
> I guess the driver releases its DMA buffer during suspend and attempts to
> allocate it back on resume, which is not really smart (if that really is the
> case).
>
Yes, we free a 70KB block (0x80 by 0x230 bytes) on suspend and
reallocate on resume, and so that's an Order 5 request. It looks
symmetric, and hasn't changed for years. I don't think we are leaking
memory, which points back to that the memory is too fragmented to
satisfy the request.
I also concur that Rafael's commit 6905b1f1 shouldn't change the logic
in the driver for systems with e100 (like yours Karol) that could
already sleep, and I don't see anything else in the driver that looks to
be relevant. I'm expecting that your test result without commit 6905b1f1
will still show the problem.
So I wonder if this new issue may be triggered by some other change in
the memory subsystem ?
Karol, how much physical RAM do you have in this system ? I'd expect
that the fragmentation would be less of an issue if there's simply more
memory in total.
Unfortunately I still have no actual repro in house.
I can try to rework the codepaths around suspend & resume so that we
don't free & reallocate this order 5 memory, but I think its risky. I'm
looking into that now.
Thanks
> Thanks,
> Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-15 12:05 [BUG 2.6.30+] e100 sometimes causes oops during resume Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-15 15:32 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-15 22:54 ` [E1000-devel] " Graham, David
2009-09-16 1:44 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-16 9:19 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-16 21:06 ` Graham, David
2009-09-16 21:17 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-16 23:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-16 23:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-17 20:42 ` Graham, David [this message]
2009-09-17 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-22 23:35 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-22 23:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-23 14:22 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-23 21:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-29 13:58 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-30 15:37 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-30 15:55 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-30 18:48 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-09-17 23:05 ` Karol Lewandowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AB29F4A.3030102@intel.com \
--to=david.graham@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox