From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Raistlin <raistlin@linux.it>,
michael@evidence.eu.com, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:58:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB8BBEF.2040604@evidence.eu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253615424.20345.76.camel@Palantir>
> This implementation is part of a FP7 European project called ACTORS,
> and financially supported by the European commission
> (see http://www.actors-project.eu).
>
> The involved partners (which include Ericsson Research, Evidence Srl,
> AKAtech) strongly believe that a general-purpose operating system like
> Linux should provide a standard real-time scheduling policy (like the
> one implemented in this patch) still allowing to schedule non-real-time
> tasks in the usual way.
Hi Peter, hi all,
note that the request of having an EDF scheduling class integrated
in the mainline kernel does not come from academy, but comes from industry.
In particular, at least the following companies are interested in this
feature:
1. ERICSSON AB (http://www.ericsson.com)
2. Evidence Srl (http://www.evidence.eu.com): who implemented the code
3. AKAtech (http://www.akatech.ch)
4. Qprel (http://www.qprel.com)
5. Tertium technology (http://www.tertiumtechnology.com)
6. M2Tech (http://www.m2tech.biz)
Then, there are _also_ some universities and research centers:
1. Scuola Sant'Anna, Italy
2. University of Pisa, Italy
3. Lunds Universitet, Lund, Sweden
4. Technical University Kaiserslautern, Germany
5. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Swiss
But I guess there are other companies and institutions interested, out
there...
Cheers,
Claudio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-22 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 10:30 [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class Raistlin
2009-09-22 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 12:51 ` Raistlin
2009-09-22 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-23 12:19 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 12:25 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-09-27 6:55 ` Henrik Austad
2009-09-29 16:10 ` Raistlin
2009-09-29 17:34 ` Chris Friesen
2009-09-30 15:58 ` Raistlin
2009-09-30 17:35 ` Chris Friesen
2009-09-22 11:58 ` Claudio Scordino [this message]
2009-09-22 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-24 16:08 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-22 13:24 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-22 14:01 ` Raistlin
2009-09-22 14:02 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-22 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 19:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 0:51 ` checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class) Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 1:01 ` Joe Perches
2009-09-23 1:11 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 19:24 ` Andy Isaacson
2009-09-24 14:58 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:06 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-23 12:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 14:43 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-23 7:03 ` [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class Raistlin
2009-09-23 21:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-24 0:58 ` GeunSik Lim
2009-09-22 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 23:39 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-09-22 23:55 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 0:06 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-09-23 0:40 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 11:46 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 12:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 14:50 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 14:58 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 15:08 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 15:24 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-22 20:55 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 13:00 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 13:22 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-23 14:08 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 14:45 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 12:33 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 12:50 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 13:30 ` Raistlin
2009-09-29 18:15 ` roel kluin
2009-09-30 15:59 ` Raistlin
2009-09-24 0:34 ` GeunSik Lim
2009-09-24 6:08 ` Raistlin
2009-09-24 9:11 ` Claudio Scordino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AB8BBEF.2040604@evidence.eu.com \
--to=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=fabio@gandalf.sssup.it \
--cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox