From: "Jayson R. King" <dev@jaysonking.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched: account system time properly
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:46:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC9C05A.8000807@jaysonking.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC9B97B.6070900@jaysonking.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
[upstream commit f5f293a4e3d0a0c52cec31de6762c95050156516]
[this is not actually necessary for applying BFS, but is included for
the sake of completeness since it is mirrored in BFS]
Andrew Gallatin reported that IRQ and SOFTIRQ times were
sometime not reported correctly on recent kernels, and even
bisected to commit 457533a7d3402d1d91fbc125c8bd1bd16dcd3cd4
([PATCH] fix scaled & unscaled cputime accounting) as the first
bad commit.
Further analysis pointed that commit
79741dd35713ff4f6fd0eafd59fa94e8a4ba922d ([PATCH] idle cputime
accounting) was the real cause of the problem.
account_process_tick() was not taking into account timer IRQ
interrupting the idle task servicing a hard or soft irq.
On mostly idle cpu, irqs were thus not accounted and top or
mpstat could tell user/admin that cpu was 100 % idle, 0.00 %
irq, 0.00 % softirq, while it was not.
[ Impact: fix occasionally incorrect CPU statistics in top/mpstat ]
Reported-by: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>
Re-reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com
Cc: brice@myri.com
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
LKML-Reference: <49F84BC1.7080602@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -udrNp linux-2.6.27.orig/kernel/sched.c linux-2.6.27/kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.27.orig/kernel/sched.c 2009-10-02 05:14:57.590579107 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.27/kernel/sched.c 2009-10-02 05:15:19.947578991 -0500
@@ -4187,7 +4187,7 @@ void account_process_tick(struct task_st
if (user_tick)
account_user_time(p, one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled);
- else if (p != rq->idle)
+ else if ((p != rq->idle) || (irq_count() != HARDIRQ_OFFSET))
account_system_time(p, HARDIRQ_OFFSET, one_jiffy,
one_jiffy_scaled);
else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-05 9:16 [PATCH 0/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27 Jayson R. King
2009-10-05 9:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] fix scaled & unscaled cputime accounting Jayson R. King
2009-10-05 9:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] idle " Jayson R. King
2009-10-05 9:46 ` Jayson R. King [this message]
2009-10-05 9:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27 Jayson R. King
2009-10-05 10:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Jayson R. King
2009-10-05 10:26 ` Jayson R. King
2009-10-05 14:12 ` David Newall
2009-10-05 16:02 ` Jayson R. King
2009-10-05 17:04 ` David Newall
2009-10-05 20:20 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AC9C05A.8000807@jaysonking.com \
--to=dev@jaysonking.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox