From: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
john.cooper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] virtio_blk: deprecate the 1024-byte ID field.
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:20:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACA1CBC.8020402@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909300941.24736.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Dienstag 29 September 2009 19:18:09 schrieb Rusty Russell:
>> PCI, lguest and s390 can all only support 256-byte configuration
>> space. So, this giant field broke just about everyone.
>> Unfortunately, removing it is not so simple: we don't want to break
>> old userspace, but we're going to want to re-use that part of the
>> struct.
>>
>> So, modern users can #define VIRTIO_BLK_IDENTIFY_DEPRECATED to indicate
>> that they know it's no longer in the config struct, and can use any
>> new features (all new features which add a configuration field will
>> conflict with this deprecated one).
>
>
> Since s390 never used the giant id field, it would be ok for us just delete it
> (without the #define). IIRC kvm-userspace also never used that. Since qemu
> upstream seems to use that field your way seems to be the only compatible...
It seems simply retiring use of the VIRTIO_BLK_F_IDENTIFY
binary value should be sufficient. The patch which
implemented the cooperating logic in qemu was dropped
due to the config space issue. So the case of a virtio_blk
driver successfully negotiating the feature and trying to
access the now depreciated structure area should effectively
be a non-issue. The bit value can be reclaimed for reuse
in the future when concern over any suspected usage falls
into the noise.
-john
--
john.cooper@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 17:18 [PATCH 1/4] virtio_blk: deprecate the 1024-byte ID field Rusty Russell
2009-09-30 7:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-10-05 16:20 ` john cooper [this message]
2009-10-06 9:21 ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-07 5:48 ` john cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACA1CBC.8020402@redhat.com \
--to=john.cooper@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox