From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: bisect results of MSI-X related panic (help!)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:52:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD2E05A.6060700@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4807377b0910091724k2a332e90i9941971f6032663c@mail.gmail.com>
Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> Kernel stack is corrupted in: ffffffff810b5b31
>
> I've built with a full debug kernel before this crash, so I did:
>
> (gdb) l *0xffffffff810b5b31
> 0xffffffff810b5b31 is in move_native_irq (kernel/irq/migration.c:67).
> 62 return;
> 63
> 64 desc->chip->mask(irq);
> 65 move_masked_irq(irq);
> 66 desc->chip->unmask(irq);
>>>> 67 }
> 68
> (gdb) l move_native_irq
> 54 void move_native_irq(int irq)
> 55 {
> 56 struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> 57
> 58 if (likely(!(desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING)))
> 59 return;
> 60
> 61 if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED))
> 62 return;
> 63
> 64 desc->chip->mask(irq);
> 65 move_masked_irq(irq);
> 66 desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> 67 }
>
> So, this seems very related to my panic, as it is likely that
> irqbalance or something else might try to move my interrupt from one
> core to another and this seems likely related, and the original issue
> as well as this one reproduce with LOTS of MSI-X vectors active.
>
> - I tried connecting after the panic with kgdboc, no connection
> - I tried kdump, but the same kernel I am using panics/hangs during
> boot right after udev during the kexec() kernel boot (should I try
> harder to get this working given it got so far?)
> - I have ftrace function tracer running but no way to get at the log
> post panic (wouldn't it be great if the kernel just dumped the ftrace
> log on __stack_chk_fail?)
>
> any other debugging tricks/ideas?
Hmm... stackprotector adds considerable amount of stack usage and it
could be you're seeing stack overflow which would also explain the
random crashes you've been seeing. Do you have DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
turned on? This is on x86_64, right?
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-12 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 20:09 bisect results of MSI-X related panic (help!) Jesse Brandeburg
2009-09-11 21:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2009-09-12 4:23 ` Frans Pop
2009-09-14 9:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 9:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-10 0:24 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2009-10-11 9:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-12 7:52 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-10-12 18:00 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2009-10-13 2:39 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-14 22:30 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2009-10-15 7:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD2E05A.6060700@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox