public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
	vatsa@in.ibm.com, Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] CFS Hard limits - v2
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:19:41 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD4705D.6020109@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013120354.GF24787@MAIL.13thfloor.at>

> as I already stated, it seems perfectly fine for me 

You're not the only one interested in it, sorry. Besides, I
got your point in "I'm find with it". Now get mine which is
about "I am not".

> can be trivially mapped to the two values, by chosing a
> fixed multiplicative base (let's say '1s' to simplify :) 
> 
>   with 50%, you get 1s/0.5s
>   with 20%, you get 1s/0.2s
>   with  5%, you get 1s/0.05s
> 
> well, you get the idea :)

No I don't.
Is 1s/0.5s worse or better than 2s/1s?
How should I make a choice?

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-30 12:49 [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] CFS Hard limits - v2 Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 12:50 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 1/8] sched: Rename sched_rt_period_mask() and use it in CFS also Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 12:51 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 2/8] sched: Maintain aggregated tasks count in cfs_rq at each hierarchy level Bharata B Rao
2009-10-13 14:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-14  3:42     ` Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 12:52 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 3/8] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair task groups Bharata B Rao
2009-10-13 14:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-14  3:49     ` Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 12:52 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 4/8] sched: Enforce hard limits by throttling Bharata B Rao
2009-10-13 14:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-14  3:41     ` Bharata B Rao
2009-10-14  9:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-14 11:50         ` Bharata B Rao
2009-10-14 13:18           ` Herbert Poetzl
2009-10-15  3:30             ` Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 12:53 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 5/8] sched: Unthrottle the throttled tasks Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 12:54 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 6/8] sched: Add throttle time statistics to /proc/sched_debug Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 12:55 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 7/8] sched: Rebalance cfs runtimes Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 12:55 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 8/8] sched: Hard limits documentation Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 13:36 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] CFS Hard limits - v2 Pavel Emelyanov
2009-09-30 14:25   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-09-30 14:39     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-09-30 15:09       ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-10-13 11:39       ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-10-13 12:03         ` Herbert Poetzl
2009-10-13 12:19           ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2009-10-13 12:30             ` Dhaval Giani
2009-10-13 12:45               ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-10-13 12:56                 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-10-13 12:57                 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-10-13 13:01                   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-10-13 14:56             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-13 22:02             ` Herbert Poetzl
2009-10-13 14:49         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-09-30 14:38   ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-30 15:10     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-09-30 15:30       ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-30 22:30         ` Herbert Poetzl
2009-10-01  5:12           ` Bharata B Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD4705D.6020109@openvz.org \
    --to=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox