public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86: unify sys_iopl
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:24:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD4A9AE.10306@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013103044.GA3915@elte.hu>

On 10/13/2009 03:30 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Pulled, thanks a lot Jeremy!
> 
> It's in tip:x86/paravirt right now. I'm uneasy about pushing this into 
> .32 - we had this status quo forever. Peter, Thomas, what do you think?
> 

First of all, the unification looks good.

As far as .32 is concerned... this *is* a bug even if this is only for
paravirt, and given the small amount of code I am personally OK with
taking the whole patch for .32.

However, the patch is not complete!  The patch incidentally eliminates
the need to have assembly stubs for sys_iopl, and those assembly stubs
should be removed.  I have a patch for that currently test building.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-25 22:05 [GIT PULL] x86: unify sys_iopl Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-25 22:56 ` Brian Gerst
2009-09-25 23:22   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-25 23:54     ` Brian Gerst
2009-09-26  0:22       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-13 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13 16:24   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-10-13 16:53     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-13 17:13       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-13 17:55       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-13 21:27       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD4A9AE.10306@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox