From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V6 3/7] Use this_cpu operations in slub
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:57:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD53022.2050309@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0910131117060.8088@gentwo.org>
Hello, Christoph.
Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> Yeah, widespread use of underscored versions isn't very desirable.
>> The underscored versions should notify certain specific exceptional
>> conditions instead of being used as general optimization (which
>> doesn't make much sense after all as the optimization is only
>> meaningful with debug option turned on). Are you interested in doing
>> a sweeping patch to drop underscores from __this_cpu_*() conversions?
>
> Nope. __this_cpu_add/dec cannot be converted.
Right.
> __this_cpu_ptr could be converted to this_cpu_ptr but I think the __ are
> useful there too to show that we are in a preempt section.
That doesn't make much sense. __ for this_cpu_ptr() means "bypass
sanity check, we're knowingly violating the required conditions" not
"we know sanity checks will pass here".
> The calls to raw_smp_processor_id and smp_processor_id() are only useful
> in the fallback case. There is no need for those if the arch has a way to
> provide the current percpu offset. So we in effect have two meanings of __
> right now.
>
> 1. We do not care about the preempt state (thus we call
> raw_smp_processor_id so that the preempt state does not trigger)
>
> 2. We do not need to disable preempt before the operation.
>
> __this_cpu_ptr only implies 1. __this_cpu_add uses 1 and 2.
Yeah, we need to clean it up. The naming is too confusing.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-14 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-07 21:10 [this_cpu_xx V6 0/7] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and avoid per cpu address arithmetic cl
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 1/7] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion cl
2009-10-08 10:38 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-08 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-08 16:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-08 10:53 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 2/7] this_cpu ops: Remove pageset_notifier cl
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 3/7] Use this_cpu operations in slub cl
2009-10-12 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 10:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 14:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 2:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-13 14:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 14:56 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-13 15:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-14 1:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-10-14 14:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-15 7:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-16 16:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-18 3:11 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 4/7] SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation cl
2009-10-13 18:48 ` [FIX] patch "SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation" Christoph Lameter
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 5/7] this_cpu: Remove slub kmem_cache fields cl
2009-10-07 23:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 6/7] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc cl
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 7/7] this_cpu: slub aggressive use of this_cpu operations in the hotpaths cl
2009-10-12 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 13:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-12 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 9:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-13 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 19:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-13 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 20:15 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-13 20:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 22:53 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-14 13:34 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-14 14:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-14 15:49 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-14 15:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-14 15:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-14 16:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-14 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-16 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-16 18:40 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-15 9:03 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-16 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-16 18:43 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-16 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 20:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-14 1:33 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-13 15:40 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 0/7] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and avoid per cpu address arithmetic Mel Gorman
2009-10-13 15:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 16:09 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-13 17:17 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD53022.2050309@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox