From: Earl Chew <earl_chew@agilent.com>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fs/pipe.c null pointer dereference
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:50:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD655C0.2030202@agilent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910141653.03611.elendil@planet.nl>
Frans Pop wrote:
> 2.6.21 is really rather ancient for the kernel community and I doubt anyone
> here will really want to look into issues with it, given that there's a
> realistic chance it has already been fixed since then. The current stable
> version is 2.6.31 after all.
>
> Can you reproduce the oops with a current kernel? Have you checked if there
> have been any changes in the code you identified since 2.6.21?
I was mostly after some guidance. I'm happy to dig around to figure
out what the problem is and log a bug if indeed I find one.
Yes, I have searched for obvious patches but didn't turn up anything.
I have looked at the code for more recent 2.6.31 kernel on
lxr.linux.no and haven't turned up any appreciable difference.
I have given the matter more thought, and I believe it is unlikely
that the problem is in fs/fifo.c. As outlined in my previous
email, the code looks ok.
I'm a little confused about the switch between the fifo_open()
and the subsequent call to pipe_rdwr_open(). My understanding
is fifo_open() is called during open("/fifo", O_RDWR) which
fills in filp->f_op to point at rdwr_fifo_fops.
Thereafter, a call to close() will vector through filp->f_op
to pipe_rdwr_release().
I'm still puzzled as to how pipe_rdwr_open() is called. The
stack trace says:
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8028125c>] __dentry_open+0x13c/0x230
[<ffffffff8028143d>] do_filp_open+0x2d/0x40
[<ffffffff802814aa>] do_sys_open+0x5a/0x100
[<ffffffff8021faf3>] sysenter_do_call+0x1b/0x67
I figure that the fileoperation for the fifo inode must be
revectored to rdwr_fifo_fops --- but I can't see that's
done exactly.
Any hints as to where to look for this ?
In any case, my current guess as to how this happens is that
there might be window of time between do_sys_open() ... pipe_rdwr_open()
where the inode is obtained and the fileoperation pointer is
followed to get to pipe_rdwr_open().
During that window of time, might it be possible for the fifo
to be closed and the underlying pipe released?
Where can I look to see if this is possible?
Earl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-14 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-14 13:39 fs/pipe.c null pointer dereference Earl Chew
2009-10-14 14:53 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-14 22:50 ` Earl Chew [this message]
2009-10-15 0:11 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-16 4:27 ` Earl Chew
2009-10-16 7:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-16 14:51 ` Earl Chew
2009-10-16 3:31 ` Earl Chew
2009-10-16 3:39 ` Earl Chew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD655C0.2030202@agilent.com \
--to=earl_chew@agilent.com \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox