* [patch 1/1 v2] pata_via.c : extend the rev_max for VT6330
@ 2009-10-16 7:45 JosephChan
2009-10-16 10:27 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: JosephChan @ 2009-10-16 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: alan, tj, jeff, JosephChan
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1221 bytes --]
Fix the VT6330 issue, it's because the rev_max of VT6330 exceeds 0x2f.
The VT6415 and VT6330 share the same device ID.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Chan <josephchan@via.com.tw>
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_via.c 2009-10-15 23:12:49.000000000 +0800
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_via.c 2009-10-15 23:12:57.000000000 +0800
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
{ "vt8251", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "cx700", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_SATA_PATA },
{ "vt6410", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6410, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
- { "vt6415", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6415, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
+ { "vt6415", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6415, 0x00, 0xff, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
{ "vt8237a", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "vt8237", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "vt8235", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/1 v2] pata_via.c : extend the rev_max for VT6330
2009-10-16 7:45 [patch 1/1 v2] pata_via.c : extend the rev_max for VT6330 JosephChan
@ 2009-10-16 10:27 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2009-10-16 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: JosephChan; +Cc: linux-kernel, stable, alan, tj
On 10/16/2009 03:45 AM, JosephChan@via.com.tw wrote:
> Fix the VT6330 issue, it's because the rev_max of VT6330 exceeds 0x2f.
> The VT6415 and VT6330 share the same device ID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Chan<josephchan@via.com.tw>
>
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_via.c 2009-10-15 23:12:49.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_via.c 2009-10-15 23:12:57.000000000 +0800
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
> { "vt8251", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
> { "cx700", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_SATA_PATA },
> { "vt6410", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6410, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
> - { "vt6415", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6415, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
> + { "vt6415", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6415, 0x00, 0xff, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
> { "vt8237a", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
> { "vt8237", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
> { "vt8235", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
applied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-16 10:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-16 7:45 [patch 1/1 v2] pata_via.c : extend the rev_max for VT6330 JosephChan
2009-10-16 10:27 ` Jeff Garzik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox