From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Commit 34d76c41 causes linker errors on ia64 with NR_CPUS=4096
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:39:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADD6915.7000909@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADD62AA.8060503@gmail.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Ingo Molnar a écrit :
>
>> Still looks like a bug if it causes a breakage (linker error) on IA64,
>> and if the 'fix' (i'd call it a workaround) causes a (small but nonzero)
>> performance regression on other architectures.
>>
>
> True, but this also save some amount of ram for some distro kernels.
>
> If we keep this static NR_CPUS thing, we might be able to free
> the end of table, for other per_cpu users ?
>
> if (nr_cpus_ids < NR_CPUS) {
> per_cpu_free_static_zone(&update_shares_data[nr_cpus_ids],
> sizeof(long)*(NR_CPUS - nr_cpus_ids));
> }
That's doable but Considering that the users of NR_CPUS are pretty few
(and should be kept that way), I think it would be better to just use
dynamic allocation, which no longer incurs any major performance
difference (the only difference is constant offset vs. pointer in a
variable), for those cases.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-18 22:28 Commit 34d76c41 causes linker errors on ia64 with NR_CPUS=4096 Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-20 2:02 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 4:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 5:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 5:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 6:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 6:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 6:27 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 14:18 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-20 14:49 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-21 6:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-21 15:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-21 22:11 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-22 14:49 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-22 14:53 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-22 22:24 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-23 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 12:30 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-26 16:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-26 20:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-27 10:03 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-27 10:52 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 6:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 6:26 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 7:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20 7:39 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-10-20 7:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 7:17 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-10-20 7:36 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 13:08 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-10-20 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-20 13:57 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20 13:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-21 6:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-20 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ADD6915.7000909@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox