public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, " <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>"@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order watermarks are being hit
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:18:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE7397A.4010907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256650833-15516-4-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

On 10/27/2009 09:40 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> When a high-order allocation fails, kswapd is kicked so that it reclaims
> at a higher-order to avoid direct reclaimers stall and to help GFP_ATOMIC
> allocations. Something has changed in recent kernels that affect the timing
> where high-order GFP_ATOMIC allocations are now failing with more frequency,
> particularly under pressure. This patch forces kswapd to notice sooner that
> high-order allocations are occuring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman<mel@csn.ul.ie>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-27 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-27 13:40 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce GFP_ATOMIC allocation failures, partial fix V3 Mel Gorman
2009-10-27 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] page allocator: Always wake kswapd when restarting an allocation attempt after direct reclaim failed Mel Gorman
2009-10-27 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use ALLOC_HARDER Mel Gorman
2009-10-27 20:09   ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-27 21:12     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-31 18:40       ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-31 19:51         ` David Rientjes
2009-10-31 20:11           ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-31 21:19             ` David Rientjes
2009-10-31 22:29               ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-31 22:55                 ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-01  7:35                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-01 12:37                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-01 14:44                     ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-01 19:32                       ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-02 16:38                       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-31 23:59             ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-02 16:42               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-11-02 20:53                 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-03 17:10                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-11-04  1:46                     ` David Rientjes
2009-11-04  9:01                       ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-09 10:11                         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-28 10:24     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27 13:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order watermarks are being hit Mel Gorman
2009-10-27 18:18   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2009-10-27 20:19   ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-28  3:54     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-28 10:29     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-28 19:47       ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-02 16:05         ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-02 17:32           ` Frans Pop
2009-11-02 17:38             ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-02 20:36               ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-03 22:01               ` Frans Pop
2009-11-03 22:08                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-04  0:01                   ` Frans Pop
2009-11-04  1:18                     ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-04  2:05                       ` Frans Pop
2009-11-04  2:08                         ` Frans Pop
2009-11-04 15:48                         ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-04 20:57                           ` Frans Pop
2009-11-05 16:48                             ` [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order watermarks are being hit (data on latencies available) Mel Gorman
2009-11-12 11:36                               ` Frans Pop
2009-11-04  2:08                       ` [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order watermarks are being hit Mel Gorman
2009-10-28 13:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] Reduce GFP_ATOMIC allocation failures, partial fix V3 Karol Lewandowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AE7397A.4010907@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>"@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox