From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RE-SUBMIT] Default setting of the ARM_UNWIND option
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:37:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE82CDC.4080409@evidence.eu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256555452.5282.21.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1209 bytes --]
Catalin Marinas ha scritto:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 09:27 +0100, Claudio Scordino wrote:
>
>> My ARM board hanged at the initial "Calibrating delay loop" message.
>>
>> After some inspection, I found out the problem to be with commit
>> adf8b37bafc1495393201a2ae4235846371870d0. This commit introduces stack
>> unwinding for ARM, and set it enabled by default. However, it seems to
>> not work with buggy or not-EABI compilers.
>>
>> My suggestion is to keep the feature (which is fine) but change the
>> default setting of the option (see the attached patch).
>>
>
> The option still depends on EXPERIMENTAL, so you get ARM_UNWIND on when
> enabling that.
>
> I'm more in favour of a #warning on #error in the unwind.c file based on
> the compiler version rather than not having it on by default. The reason
> is that people reported performance improvements when compiling the
> kernel without frame pointers.
>
This solution is fine too (even if I still think that changing the
default setting is better).
Please, consider the patch in attachment: is it like you would have it ?
BTW, do we have any list of buggy or not-EABI versions of the gcc compiler ?
Many thanks,
Claudio
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Disable-stack-unwinding-support-by-default-since-it.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1209 bytes --]
From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:59:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Disable stack unwinding support by default, since it does not work on some buggy or not-EABI compilers.
Disable stack unwinding support by default, since it does not work on some
buggy or not-EABI compilers.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
---
arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
index 1a6f70e..925e3fd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
@@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ config FRAME_POINTER
config ARM_UNWIND
bool "Enable stack unwinding support"
depends on AEABI && EXPERIMENTAL
- default y
+ default n
help
This option enables stack unwinding support in the kernel
using the information automatically generated by the
compiler. The resulting kernel image is slightly bigger but
the performance is not affected. Currently, this feature
- only works with EABI compilers. If unsure say Y.
+ only works with EABI compilers. If unsure say N.
config DEBUG_USER
bool "Verbose user fault messages"
--
1.6.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4AD73DA4.4050006@evidence.eu.com>
[not found] ` <1255620333.10164.77.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
2009-10-19 10:15 ` [PATCH] Default setting of the ARM_UNWIND option Claudio Scordino
2009-10-19 10:16 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-10-26 8:27 ` [PATCH][RE-SUBMIT] " Claudio Scordino
2009-10-26 11:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-28 11:37 ` Claudio Scordino [this message]
2009-10-28 11:37 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-10-28 14:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-30 11:11 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-10-30 12:39 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE82CDC.4080409@evidence.eu.com \
--to=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).