From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org, joerg.roedel@amd.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] bootmem: add free_bootmem_late
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:12:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE83541.3030306@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020910280438j65bcacacq731f6076cbd8d99@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>> ISTR an attempt to initialize the kmalloc allocator much earlier
>> during boot such that it can completely replace the bootmem allocator,
>> which would nicely remove all the complications although it may
>> require the kmalloc allocator to go through more complex boot
>> strapping steps. I didn't follow how that went. Did it prove to be
>> unworkable?
>
> We're doing it before scheduler init now but I haven't put any effort
> into moving it earlier than that yet. I don't see any fundamental
> reason we can't do that but the practical problem is that we're going
> to affect architecture specific boot code which is really hard to
> test.
Thanks for the explanation. It would be really great if we can pull
that off someday. This should be doable architecture-by-architecture,
right? You can, for example, first convert x86 and then make bootmem
allocator thin wrapper around the slab allocator. After all archs
have been converted, the wrappers can be dropped.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-28 6:47 [PATCH 0/10] x86: handle HW IOMMU initialization failure gracely FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 01/10] Add iommu_init to x86_init_ops FUJITA Tomonori
2009-11-09 20:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-09 20:11 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-11-10 4:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 02/10] Calgary: convert detect_calgary to use iommu_init hook FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 13:38 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 03/10] GART: convert gart_iommu_hole_init " FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 04/10] amd_iommu: convert amd_iommu_detect " FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 05/10] intel-iommu: convert detect_intel_iommu " FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 06/10] bootmem: refactor free_all_bootmem_core FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-28 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 07/10] bootmem: add free_bootmem_late FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-28 8:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-28 11:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-28 12:12 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-10-29 11:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-08 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 10:27 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-11-06 1:50 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-11-08 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-09 19:22 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-11-09 20:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-09 20:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-09 21:47 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-11-10 8:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-13 21:11 ` Chris Wright
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 08/10] swiotlb: add swiotlb_free function FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 09/10] swiotlb: export swiotlb_print_info FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 6:47 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86: handle HW IOMMU initialization failure gracely FUJITA Tomonori
2009-10-28 13:21 ` [PATCH 0/10] " Joerg Roedel
2009-10-29 8:27 ` FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE83541.3030306@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox