From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ia64/sn: fix percpu warnings
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:37:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE87344.6030708@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA3E34C0108@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hello,
Luck, Tony wrote:
> That's what Randy's patch uses ... but doing it the "right" way gives
> me the "has no CRC!" warning.
Ah, right. I got confused.
> This seems to be a feature of exported per cpu arrays. If I hack
> up a driver to make use of softirq_work_list, I see a similar
> no CRC warning for it.
>
> Is this problem in the ia64 tool chain[1]? Or do other architectures
> have problems with exported per cpu arrays?
kern/softirq.c has the followings.
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head [NR_SOFTIRQS], softirq_work_list);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(softirq_work_list);
and it doesn't cause any warning on x86 neither does it on ia64 with
defconfig. softirq_work_list doesn't trigger any warning there,
right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-14 5:34 linux-next: Tree for October 14 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-14 15:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-10-14 21:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-14 22:10 ` [PATCH -next] ia64/sn: fix percpu warnings Randy Dunlap
2009-10-15 1:33 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-26 18:24 ` Tony Luck
2009-10-26 23:35 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-28 15:03 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-28 16:24 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-28 16:37 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-10-28 16:58 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-28 22:23 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-29 14:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-29 15:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-30 16:05 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-14 22:10 ` [PATCH -next] kvm: fix ia64 printk formats Randy Dunlap
2009-10-15 2:32 ` Zhang, Xiantao
2009-10-15 1:17 ` [PATCH -next] vmxnet: fix 2 build problems Randy Dunlap
2009-10-15 2:00 ` [Pv-drivers] " Bhavesh Davda
2009-10-15 3:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE87344.6030708@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox