public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/kprobes: prevent jprobes from crashing function graph tracer
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:22:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEA23AB.9020605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256854653.26028.3255.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 18:02 -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:\
>>> The solution I am proposing with this patch set is to add a call in
>>> ftrace that lets other code in the kernel permanently disable functions from
>>> being traced by the function and function graph tracer. As a probe function
>>> is registered with jprobes, it calls this new function and that entry
>>> will be removed from being traced.
>>>
>>> I tested this with this patch series and it does solve the problem.
>>>
>>> Some issues though:
>>>
>>> 1) this only works when DYNAMIC_FTRACE is enabled. We can prevent
>>> function graph tracing with jprobes when DYNAMIC_FTRACE is not
>>> enabled through Kconfig dependencies. Or have the registering of
>>> a jprobe permanently disable function graph tracing.
>>
>> IMHO, those *probe handler should be tagged as __kprobes and notrace.
> 
> Yeah, I agree. But how do you guarantee that it does. If one forgets,
> than we still have the issue. We can perhaps test to make sure the
> function is in the kprobes section. But that does not mean they will not
> be notraced. The __kprobes and notrace are no longer in the same set.
> 
>>
>>> 2) This also prevents the function tracer from being able to trace a
>>> function probe, even though the function tracer is not at issue
>>> with this bug.
>>
>> I think we can skip those user handlers, because those are irregular
>> functions and user can control (enable/disable) it.
> 
> True, but it may be nice to still trace them.

Hm, in that case, I think we can change jprobe_return() to call
f-g-tracer's return handler if needed as below;
---
static inline jprobe_return(void)
{
	implicit_function_return();	/* This executes f-g-tracer prologue */
	__jprobe_return();	/* This should be notraced */
}
---

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-29 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-29 20:51 [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/kprobes: prevent jprobes from crashing function graph tracer Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 1/3][RFC] [PATCH 1/3] tracing: Clean up ftrace.h header and add ftrace_set_notrace() declaration Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/3][RFC] [PATCH 2/3] tracing: Add calls to permanently disable functions from tracing Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 3/3][RFC] [PATCH 3/3] tracing/kprobes: Disable tracing registered jprobe callback functions Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 22:02 ` [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/kprobes: prevent jprobes from crashing function graph tracer Masami Hiramatsu
2009-10-29 22:17   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 22:26     ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-29 23:22     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2009-10-30  0:06       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-30  0:49         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-02  0:37   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-02 15:02     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-02 20:22       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-02 20:30         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-10-31 20:06 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-11-01 14:48   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEA23AB.9020605@redhat.com \
    --to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox