public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <teheo@suse.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Sysfs: Allow directories to be populated	dynamically
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:06:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEB0F0C.2040106@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091030111452.GP10555@parisc-linux.org>

Hello,

Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> In this particular case, the trade off is actually much worse because
>> sysfs_dirent is being increased but the only one which is seeing any
>> kind of memory usage drop is the new msi-x code.  Given that there can
>> be only a handful of msi-x controllers even in a fairly large system,
>> I don't think memory usage will be reduced in any meaningful way even
>> on affected systems and if you think about large systems with
>> thousands and tens of thousands block devices, the bloat in
>> sysfs_dirent will waste a lot of memory.
> 
> Every attribute sees a drop in memory usage.  I think I saw about 30%
> fewer dirents created on boot with this laptop.  Why not try this patch
> on one of your machines and see the difference?

Heh... Sorry, I'm still travelling so testing is a bit difficult but
even if you reduce the number of dirents by 30% if you add three
pointers worth of memory to each sysfs_dirent, I don't think it will
amount to any meaningful amount of memory usage drop and given that
sysfs_dirent can be reduced further in size with some tricks, I think
that would be the better way to reduce memory footprint.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-30 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-20  5:47 [PATCH 0/3] Allow sysfs to be dynamically populated Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-20  5:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] Fix updating of named attribute groups Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-29 15:59   ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-29 16:19     ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-29 16:24       ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-20  5:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] Sysfs: Allow directories to be populated dynamically Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-29 16:20   ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-29 16:21     ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-29 16:28       ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-29 19:24         ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-30 10:17           ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-30 11:14             ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-30 16:06               ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-10-20  5:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] Expose MSI-X interrupts through a dynamically generated sysfs directory Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-20  8:14   ` Américo Wang
2009-10-20  8:26     ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-10-27 17:32       ` Greg KH
2009-10-20  5:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] Allow sysfs to be dynamically populated Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEB0F0C.2040106@suse.de \
    --to=teheo@suse.de \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox