From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>
Cc: dimm <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ RFC, PATCH - 1/2 ] x86-microcode: refactor microcode output messages
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:17:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEF1424.2030200@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091102164621.GF30802@alberich.amd.com>
Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:22:59PM +0100, dimm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> this is in response to Mike's patch "Limit the number of microcode
>> messages".
>>
>> What's about the following (yet preliminary and not thoroughly tested)
>> approach?
>
> Hmm, patch-1 doesn't apply:
>
> patching file arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
> patching file arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 152 (offset -4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 240 (offset -7 lines).
> patch: **** malformed patch at line 99: size_t size)
>
>
>> patch-1:
>>
>> simplify 'struct ucode_cpu_info' and related operational logic.
>>
>>
>> patch-2:
>>
>> reduce a number of similar 'microcode version' messages by printing a
>> single message for all cpus with equal microcode version, like:
>
> Would be useful on systems with many cores.
>
> On AMD multi-socket systems often you have the same CPU revisions and
> thus you'd like to have similar ucode on all cores. Hence there is a
> high chance that your code would reduce the amount of microcode log
> messages during boot.
>
> I'd like to test it but would need patches that do apply ...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
I will test it here as well.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-02 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-01 22:22 [ RFC, PATCH - 1/2 ] x86-microcode: refactor microcode output messages dimm
2009-11-01 22:25 ` [ RFC, PATCH - 2/2 " dimm
2009-11-02 16:46 ` [ RFC, PATCH - 1/2 " Andreas Herrmann
2009-11-02 17:17 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-11-02 17:19 ` Dmitry Adamushko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AEF1424.2030200@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox