From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753483AbZKDBkG (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:40:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753158AbZKDBkF (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:40:05 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com ([209.85.219.207]:52498 "EHLO mail-ew0-f207.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752332AbZKDBkE (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:40:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZpG8Vpu39Lh4AosH1Zy7J8k/KZWs7jTUvyQKJVeMD07nAnGCwKzN22UmgtI3bbt3NI KycDzxYCoerSAKpphlay3q5ghbF+aDc8OFWQoOjH7jBOPAN7hAycSEpF/baiYPx7P9/b qYBwCjm6x2xmGYTNgA2SeP/4u7YnM7YhftxJw= Message-ID: <4AF0DB84.8050006@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:40:20 -0800 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Spicebird/0.7.1 (X11; 2009022519) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KOSAKI Motohiro CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 References: <20091104101410.D43E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20091104101410.D43E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm not sure how to handle this, >> while compiling firefox-3.6b1.source >> I get this with the default compiling options, >> as well as custom: >> >> >> [ 532.942324] cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 >> [ 532.942330] Pid: 16002, comm: cc1plus Tainted: P >> 2.6.32-rc5-00083-g04ea458 #2 >> [ 532.942333] Call Trace: >> [ 532.942342] [] T.417+0x7c/0x245 >> [ 532.942347] [] __out_of_memory+0x142/0x159 >> [ 532.942352] [] out_of_memory+0x6e/0x9d >> [ 532.942357] [] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x47e/0x5cc >> [ 532.942363] [] handle_mm_fault+0x25d/0x68e >> [ 532.942369] [] do_page_fault+0x2bb/0x2d3 >> [ 532.942373] [] page_fault+0x25/0x30 >> [ 532.942376] Mem-Info: >> [ 532.942378] DMA per-cpu: >> [ 532.942380] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 >> [ 532.942383] CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 >> [ 532.942385] DMA32 per-cpu: >> [ 532.942388] CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 94 >> [ 532.942391] CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 23 >> [ 532.942393] Normal per-cpu: >> [ 532.942395] CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 150 >> [ 532.942398] CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 155 >> [ 532.942404] active_anon:707575 inactive_anon:264673 isolated_anon:0 >> [ 532.942406] active_file:58 inactive_file:33 isolated_file:0 >> > > file cache (active_file + inactive_file) was very little. It indicate anyone waste too much memory. > I doubt you use buggy compiler. > > > > hmm... then this is something with firefox then.. In that case I'll continue to build my system with this compiler. Although a bit concerned building everything for the system with a compiler that shows some memory issue,but if you say its not the compiler, then I'll carry on with what I'm doing. (and use an older compiler for firefox). Justin P. Mattock