From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
To: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@cs.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:48:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF1DA8D.9070009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd18b0c30911040839ice58f81v7c8aa10e79f5d1b8@mail.gmail.com>
Justin Mattock wrote:
> O.k. here is the info from dmesg(with the patch added)
> and what -fmem-report:
I don't know how to read the oom dmesg, but as to the -fmem-report:
> Memory still allocated at the end of the compilation process
> Size Allocated Used Overhead
> Total 7200k 5293k 104k
... what that's telling us is that there isn't a substantial leak in GCC, as
there's only 7 meg left unreclaimed by GC at the end. I think we'll have to
wait and see what the debugger tells us; either GCC really is using that much
memory in processing the file, or there's some kind of system or kernel bug
you're running into that is causing a leak in the VMM rather than the application.
> String pool
> bytes 86k (17592186044415M overhead)
0xFFFFFFFFFFF00000, lol, wut? It's possible that indicates some sort of
memory corruption going on. Maybe valgrind can help, do you have that?
cheers,
DaveK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-04 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-02 21:29 cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
2009-11-02 21:49 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-11-02 22:02 ` Justin Mattock
2009-11-02 22:05 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-11-02 22:12 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-11-03 0:56 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-11-04 1:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-04 1:40 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-11-04 6:24 ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-04 6:44 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-11-04 9:14 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-11-04 9:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-04 15:28 ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-04 23:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-04 13:13 ` Dave Korn
2009-11-04 15:08 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-11-04 15:45 ` Dave Korn
2009-11-04 16:39 ` Justin Mattock
2009-11-04 19:48 ` Dave Korn [this message]
2009-11-04 20:39 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-11-04 21:22 ` Justin Mattock
2009-11-05 0:36 ` Dave Korn
2009-11-05 3:36 ` Justin Mattock
2009-11-05 5:08 ` Dave Korn
2009-11-06 21:21 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-11-10 2:55 ` Justin P. Mattock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF1DA8D.9070009@gmail.com \
--to=dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=justinmattock@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@cs.washington.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox