RE: [PATCH RFC] [X86] performance improvement for memcpy_64.S by fast string.

Ma, Ling
2009-11-13T07:23:39Z

Hi H. Peter Anvin
>What it sounds to me is that for Nehalem, we want to use memcpy_c for >=
>1024 bytes and the old code for < 1024 bytes;

Yes, so we modify memcpy_c as memcpy_new for Nehalem, and keep old
code for Core2 is acceptable?

Thanks
Ling