From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:55:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFA35CB.5030801@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0911101338190.31845@localhost.localdomain>
Hello,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I want the cleanup because I think that the code sucks from a "future
> proofing" and readability standpoint, but I really don't mind one way or
> the other whether you want to finally do that one "return 1" correctly for
> one commit, only to then fix it to not do that three-way test of a single
> function in the next one.
>
> So whatever works - as long as the end result both looks sane and doesn't
> have the bug we clearly have now.
I was mostly worrying about introducing unrelated bug while changing.
Anyways, one patch it is. I'll route it through tip as suggested by
Ingo in a few hours.
Thanks a lot.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 6:04 [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6 Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 18:33 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 19:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 19:50 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 3:55 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-11-11 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-11 12:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 19:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 10:11 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 10:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 11:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 14:26 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-12 15:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 15:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 15:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 17:04 ` Andres Baldrich
2009-11-12 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 18:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 18:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-12 11:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 11:29 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 8:49 ` [PATCH percpu#for-linus] percpu: restructure pcpu_extend_area_map() to fix bugs and improve readability Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 19:44 ` [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6 Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-13 3:53 Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFA35CB.5030801@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox