From: "ramaswamy.bm" <ramaswamy.bm@globaledgesoft.com>
To: kaber@trash.net
Cc: arrow.jianqing@gmail.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ?
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:17:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFA6C0D.2020101@globaledgesoft.com> (raw)
What is the command to write port based SA's using ip xfrm state.
iam using below command for writing SA's :
ip xfrm state add src 192.168.1.20 dst 192.168.1.5 proto esp spi
0x354cb04b mode tunnel reqid 16385 replay-window 32 auth sha1
0xecf02a5cf6568556e1bdcd961c7ec3f92afd01cc enc aes
0x5c0cfa9672ce67ba545b593076dfb278 sel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
Thanks in advance
Ram
he pfkey / xfrm interface throws them away
i fixed racoon to send the port numbers and they were ignored
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McHardy [mailto:kaber@...sh.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:12 AM
To: Paul Moore
Cc: David Miller; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: port bound SAs
Paul Moore wrote:
> i did exactly that (in the original message) and it makes this test
case
> work but as I point out
>
> a) it should not be necessary
> b) i get more SAs than I need
> c) i can no longer say that a SA is optional (this is an error in the
> pfkey/xfrm/racoon interface to combine two orthogonal concepts)
> d) I am not convinced that I have resolved all cases. Needs more
testing
IIRC I tested port selectors in SA a few years ago using "ip xfrm"
and they worked fine. The xfrm interface doesn't ignore them
(copy_from_user_state()), I think the pfkey interface also doesn't.
Please try configuring them manually using "ip xfrm state",
I'm pretty sure the bug is actually in racoon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 7:47 ramaswamy.bm [this message]
2009-11-11 23:15 ` Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ? Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFA6C0D.2020101@globaledgesoft.com \
--to=ramaswamy.bm@globaledgesoft.com \
--cc=arrow.jianqing@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox