* Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ?
@ 2009-11-11 7:47 ramaswamy.bm
2009-11-11 23:15 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: ramaswamy.bm @ 2009-11-11 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber; +Cc: arrow.jianqing, herbert, linux-kernel
What is the command to write port based SA's using ip xfrm state.
iam using below command for writing SA's :
ip xfrm state add src 192.168.1.20 dst 192.168.1.5 proto esp spi
0x354cb04b mode tunnel reqid 16385 replay-window 32 auth sha1
0xecf02a5cf6568556e1bdcd961c7ec3f92afd01cc enc aes
0x5c0cfa9672ce67ba545b593076dfb278 sel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
Thanks in advance
Ram
he pfkey / xfrm interface throws them away
i fixed racoon to send the port numbers and they were ignored
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McHardy [mailto:kaber@...sh.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:12 AM
To: Paul Moore
Cc: David Miller; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: port bound SAs
Paul Moore wrote:
> i did exactly that (in the original message) and it makes this test
case
> work but as I point out
>
> a) it should not be necessary
> b) i get more SAs than I need
> c) i can no longer say that a SA is optional (this is an error in the
> pfkey/xfrm/racoon interface to combine two orthogonal concepts)
> d) I am not convinced that I have resolved all cases. Needs more
testing
IIRC I tested port selectors in SA a few years ago using "ip xfrm"
and they worked fine. The xfrm interface doesn't ignore them
(copy_from_user_state()), I think the pfkey interface also doesn't.
Please try configuring them manually using "ip xfrm state",
I'm pretty sure the bug is actually in racoon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ?
2009-11-11 7:47 Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ? ramaswamy.bm
@ 2009-11-11 23:15 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2009-11-11 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ramaswamy.bm; +Cc: kaber, arrow.jianqing, linux-kernel
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:17:25PM +0530, ramaswamy.bm wrote:
> What is the command to write port based SA's using ip xfrm state.
>
> iam using below command for writing SA's : ip xfrm state add src
> 192.168.1.20 dst 192.168.1.5 proto esp spi 0x354cb04b mode tunnel reqid
> 16385 replay-window 32 auth sha1
> 0xecf02a5cf6568556e1bdcd961c7ec3f92afd01cc enc aes
> 0x5c0cfa9672ce67ba545b593076dfb278 sel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
Usually you don't want port-based SAs but port-based policies.
The syntax is described in "ip xfrm policy help". Look for sport
and dport.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-11 23:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-11 7:47 Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ? ramaswamy.bm
2009-11-11 23:15 ` Herbert Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox