Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode

Matteo Croce
2009-11-08T19:46:53Z

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@sdinet.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>> On Sun 2009-11-08 18:40:06, Matteo Croce wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> > > On Fri 2009-11-06 23:18:06, Matteo Croce wrote:
>> > >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>> > >> > On 11/06/2009 06:59 AM, Matteo Croce wrote:
>> > >> >> indeed it has MMX, MMXEXT and CMOV, just lacks the long NOP instruction (NOPL).
>> > >> >
>> > >> > MMX and MMXEXT are hardly hallmarks of i686, which leaves only cmov.
>> > >> > I'm somewhat wondering about the general value of this patch; is i686
>> > >> > code really that much faster on Geode that it's worth it?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > ? ? ? ?-hpa
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>> > >> > I work for Intel. ?I don't speak on their behalf.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> yes, I did some test like gzip, bzip2, lame etc and they give more or less
>> > >> the same results of dhrystone
>> > >>
>> > >> root@alix:/usr/src# CFLAGS='-march=i586' ./dry.c
>> > >> Microseconds for one run through Dhrystone:        1.4
>> > >> Dhrystones per Second:                          740741
>> > > ...
>> > >> root@alix:/usr/src# CFLAGS='-march=i686' ./dry.c
>> > >> Trying 5000000 runs through Dhrystone:
>> > >> Microseconds for one run through Dhrystone:        1.2
>> > >> Dhrystones per Second:                          841751
>> > >
>> > > Teach gcc that geodelx exists? No need to break kernel for that... and
>> > > you probably can gain even bigger gains.
>
> But no standard distribution will be made available in a geode special
> version - not enough machines in the marekt. So I think it is better to
> be able to use the i686 specific things they already support, like
> libc6-686 from debian for example.

That's exactly the patch point