From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:05:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFC6A6D.1040809@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091112180910.GA8598@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>
>> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> @@ -442,6 +442,84 @@
>> return c->llc_shared_map;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Summarize Processor Information */
>> +static void __init summarize_cpu_info(void)
>> +{
>> + cpumask_var_t cpulist, cpusdone;
>> + int cpu;
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpulist, GFP_KERNEL))
>> + err = 1;
>> + else if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpusdone, GFP_KERNEL)) {
>> + free_cpumask_var(cpulist);
>> + err = 1;
>> + }
>> + if (err) {
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "Can't print processor summaries\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cpumask_clear(cpusdone);
>> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
>> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c;
>> + char buf[128];
>> + int ncpu, len;
>> + unsigned long minlpj, maxlpj, avglpj = 0;
>> +
>> + /* skip if cpu has already been displayed */
>> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpusdone))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + c = &cpu_data(cpu);
>> + minlpj = ULONG_MAX;
>> + maxlpj = 0;
>> +
>> + cpumask_clear(cpulist);
>> +
>> + /* collate all cpus with same specifics */
>> + for (ncpu = cpu; ncpu < nr_cpu_ids; ncpu++) {
>> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *n = &cpu_data(ncpu);
>> +
>> + if (c->x86 != n->x86 ||
>> + c->x86_vendor != n->x86_vendor ||
>> + c->x86_model != n->x86_model ||
>> + c->x86_mask != n->x86_mask ||
>> + strcmp(c->x86_model_id, n->x86_model_id))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + cpumask_set_cpu(ncpu, cpulist);
>> + cpumask_set_cpu(ncpu, cpusdone);
>> +
>> + if (cpu_data(ncpu).loops_per_jiffy < minlpj)
>> + minlpj = cpu_data(ncpu).loops_per_jiffy;
>> +
>> + if (cpu_data(ncpu).loops_per_jiffy > maxlpj)
>> + maxlpj = cpu_data(ncpu).loops_per_jiffy;
>> +
>> + avglpj += cpu_data(ncpu).loops_per_jiffy;
>> + }
>> +
>> + len = cpulist_scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), cpulist);
>> + printk(KERN_INFO
>> + "Processor Information for CPUS: %s%s\n",
>> + buf, (len == sizeof(buf)-1) ? "..." : "");
>> +
>> + printk(KERN_INFO);
>> + print_cpu_info(c);
>> +
>> + avglpj /= cpumask_weight(cpulist);
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "BogoMIPS: MIN %lu.%02lu (%lu) "
>> + "AVG %lu.%02lu (%lu) MAX %lu.%02lu (%lu)\n",
>> + minlpj/(500000/HZ), (minlpj/(5000/HZ)) % 100, minlpj,
>> + avglpj/(500000/HZ), (avglpj/(5000/HZ)) % 100, avglpj,
>> + maxlpj/(500000/HZ), (maxlpj/(5000/HZ)) % 100, maxlpj);
>> + }
>> +
>> + free_cpumask_var(cpusdone);
>> + free_cpumask_var(cpulist);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Sigh, that's _way_ too complex.
>
> If you cannot print it in a summarized way without carrying over stupid
> state like bitmaps then please do the simple and obvious, and print:
>
> booting CPUs: #0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 ...
That is almost exactly what it does. The following function prints
each cpu # as they are being booted, so you see a progressive listing.
Booting Node 0, Processors 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ok.
Booting Node 1, Processors 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Ok.
Booting Node 2, Processors 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ok.
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+ if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
+ static int current_node = -1;
+ int node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+
+ if (node != current_node) {
+ if (current_node > (-1))
+ pr_cont(" Ok.\n");
+ current_node = node;
+ pr_info("Booting Node %3d, Processors ", node);
+ }
+ pr_cont(" %d%s", cpu, cpu == (nr_cpu_ids - 1) ? " Ok.\n" : "");
+ } else
+#endif
+ pr_info("Booting Processor %d APIC 0x%x\n", cpu, apicid);
The part you highlight above is to print the summary shown below of the cpus
in the system after they have been booted, and since it's an init function,
it will be removed.
Processor Information for CPUS: 0-191,208-223,256-271,...
Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000 @ 2.13GHz stepping 04
BogoMIPS: MIN 3989.01 (7978031) AVG 4266.62 (8533249) MAX 4537.51 (9075028)
Processor Information for CPUS: 192-207,240-255,272-287,...
Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000 @ 2.13GHz stepping 03
BogoMIPS: MIN 4021.49 (8042995) AVG 4265.91 (8531833) MAX 4479.79 (8959584)
> It's a really long line with 4096 CPUs but that's not a big problem - on
> most systems it will look sane.
>
> Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-12 17:19 [PATCH 0/7] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 18:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 20:05 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-11-13 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 13:43 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 22:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-13 13:46 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-13 21:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] ACPI: Limit the number of per cpu ACPI " Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:02 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-12 21:19 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:28 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-13 13:53 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu INIT " Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:06 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-12 21:20 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: Limit the number of per cpu MCE bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 20:48 ` [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log David Rientjes
2009-11-13 9:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 10:02 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-13 10:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 10:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-13 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 18:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-20 18:58 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 22:16 ` [PATCH 0/7] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFC6A6D.1040809@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox