From: Christian Volkmann <haveaniceday@cv-sv.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Does a kernel assisted file system reorder make sense?
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:39:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFFDA7C.6010907@cv-sv.de> (raw)
Hi,
I just have read some articles about faster booting systems
(Ubuntu 9.10) , SSD, hard disks, latency and seek times...
Due to this I have some ideas which I like to discuss.
I am for sure not the first with this idea, but I do not
find any discussion about it. :)
Shouldn't it be possible for the kernel to provide an ordered
loaded block list read from disk ? This could be used for a kind
of "forced reorder" for a file system tool.
May be this would also fasten the system start from a hard disk.
I could imagine a scenario like:
- kernel start (boot loader )
- kernel to keep a list of the read blocks (on a per filesystem base)
- kernel to log this list just before init starts.
- on demand: kernel to continue the recording
- on demand: kernel can signaled to log this list.
(e.g. graphic log in ready )
This logged list could be use from a new tool like "e2reorder"
for ext2/3/4 to reorder the blocks within the file system(s) to
reduce the seek delay for a start from a hard disk.
The logged list could also be used as a "to load/cache first" list
for the kernel/initrd boot. This might fasten the start without
special file system tools or for file systems without support.
But this would only make sense if a system boot is delayed by
hard disk seek times. I have no SSD to check if a SSD boots
faster. Does anyone have the experience if a SSD boots faster?
Best regards,
Christian
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-15 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-15 10:39 Christian Volkmann [this message]
2009-11-15 11:38 ` Does a kernel assisted file system reorder make sense? Alexander Clouter
2009-11-15 13:37 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFFDA7C.6010907@cv-sv.de \
--to=haveaniceday@cv-sv.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox