public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:45:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B01C803.1010303@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091116212427.GC2221@elte.hu>



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
> 
>> --- linux.orig/init/calibrate.c
>> +++ linux/init/calibrate.c
>> @@ -123,23 +123,26 @@
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long ticks, loopbit;
>>  	int lps_precision = LPS_PREC;
>> +	bool boot_cpu = (smp_processor_id() == 0);
> 
> this code is shared by other architectures too - are you sure 
> smp_processor_id()==0 is a proper 'I am the boot CPU' assumption 
> everywhere?
> 
> 	Ingo

This was where having the boot_cpu_id would have been handy.

I could add something like:

--- linux.orig/init/main.c
+++ linux/init/main.c
@@ -539,13 +539,15 @@
  *     Activate the first processor.
  */

+int boot_cpu_id __read_mostly;
+
 static void __init boot_cpu_init(void)
 {
-       int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+       int boot_cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
        /* Mark the boot cpu "present", "online" etc for SMP and UP case */
-       set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
-       set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
-       set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
+       set_cpu_online(boot_cpu_id, true);
+       set_cpu_present(boot_cpu_id, true);
+       set_cpu_possible(boot_cpu_id, true);
 }

 void __init __weak smp_setup_processor_id(void)

and remove boot_cpu_id from arch/x86 ... ?

Thanks,
Mike

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-16 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-16 21:07 [PATCH 0/6] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:34     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: Limit the number of per cpu MCE " Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:35     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17  7:10       ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-17 17:16         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 18:40         ` [PATCH] x86, mce: rework output of MCE banks ownership information Mike Travis
2009-12-14 21:46           ` Mike Travis
2009-12-15  1:50             ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:24   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:27     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:43       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-16 21:46         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:50           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17  3:09             ` David Miller
2009-11-17 15:59               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:29                 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 17:42                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 17:49                     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 17:54                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-17 17:59                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:51               ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:45     ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-11-16 21:48       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 22:51         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 22:55           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B01C803.1010303@sgi.com \
    --to=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox