public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, rdreier@cisco.com,
	rdunlap@xenotime.net, tj@kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
	gregkh@suse.de, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, steiner@sgi.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:51:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B02D493.7000305@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091116.190922.182816918.davem@davemloft.net>



David Miller wrote:
> From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:50:52 +0300
> 
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 01:46:07PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2009 01:43 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>>> It seems we have one
>>>>
>>>> 	arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:125:unsigned int boot_cpu_id __read_mostly;
>>>>
>>>> 	-- Cyrill
>>> We probably should make it an inline function so that if other arches
>>> want to define it to be a constant or some other kind of special thing
>>> they can.
>> IA-64 and SPARC already has this variable. But boot_cpu_id() as an
>> inline function seem to be more natural/portable ineed.
> 
> Only 32-bit SPARC actually has it.  On sparc64 we have no reason to
> remember which processor was the boot cpu, and remembering it merely
> for the sake of only printing out the bogomips message once seems a
> bit excessive?
> 
> How about:
> 
> 	static bool printed;
> 
> 	if (!printed) {
> 		printk(...);
> 		printed = true;
> 	}
> 
> Or, alternatively, use an atomic_t instead of a bool if you think
> races matter this early in the boot process.

Yeah, I was thinking along these same lines.  Thanks for the feedback!

Mike

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-17 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-16 21:07 [PATCH 0/6] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:34     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: Limit the number of per cpu MCE " Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:35     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17  7:10       ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-17 17:16         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 18:40         ` [PATCH] x86, mce: rework output of MCE banks ownership information Mike Travis
2009-12-14 21:46           ` Mike Travis
2009-12-15  1:50             ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:24   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:27     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:43       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-16 21:46         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:50           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17  3:09             ` David Miller
2009-11-17 15:59               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:29                 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 17:42                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 17:49                     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 17:54                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-17 17:59                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:51               ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-11-16 21:45     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:48       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 22:51         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 22:55           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B02D493.7000305@sgi.com \
    --to=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox