From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:18:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B042C51.7000500@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091118104855.GA593@aftab>
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:17:53PM -0600, Mike Travis wrote:
>> When there are a large number of processors in a system, there
>> is an excessive amount of messages sent to the system console.
>> It's estimated that with 4096 processors in a system, and the
>> console baudrate set to 56K, the startup messages will take
>> about 84 minutes to clear the serial port.
>>
>> This set of patches limits the number of repetitious messages
>> which contain no additional information. Much of this information
>> is obtainable from the /proc and /sysfs. Some of the messages
>> are also sent to the kernel log buffer as KERN_DEBUG messages so
>> dmesg can be used to examine more closely any details specific to
>> a problem.
>>
>> The list of message transformations....
>>
>> For system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING:
>>
>> Booting Node 0, Processors #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Ok.
>
> Aren't we missing core 0 here?
Core 0 already booted as it's the Boot CPU. The info is earlier
in the log.
>
>> Booting Node 1, Processors #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 Ok.
>> ..
>> Booting Node 3, Processors #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 Ok.
>> Brought up 64 CPUs
>
> Also, I'm getting
>
> Booting Node 0, Processors #1
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
There are other patches that deal with these:
http://git.kernel.org/tip/15cd8812ab2ce62a2f779e93a8398bdad752291a
http://git.kernel.org/tip/b01c845f0f2e3f9e54e6a78d5d56895f5b95e818
> #2
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
> #3
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
> #4
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
> #5
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
> Ok.
> Booting Node 1, Processors #6
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
> #7
>
> ...
>
> and clearly CPU cache info is too verbose. We might want to
> kill it since we have it replicated in /sysfs. In that case,
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:display_cacheinfo() could become obsolete
> and we could remove it... Or is there some reason for dumping that
> particular information during boot?
>
Yes, the above patches remove them entirely.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-18 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 19:17 [PATCH 0/5] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-17 20:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-17 20:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-17 21:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-18 2:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-18 17:44 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-18 17:43 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 21:05 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-18 10:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-11-18 17:18 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-11-18 18:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration " Mike Travis
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-18 0:22 [PATCH 0/5] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-18 0:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-18 2:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-18 17:43 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-26 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B042C51.7000500@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox