From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:44:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B043298.1010208@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440911171838q6e96670bnbf4db822484b7204@mail.gmail.com>
Is this a bug report? Can you supply the system configuration, config
file and the kernel release/patched status?
I've tested the patches on a few different (Intel) architectures
and haven't encountered any panics yet.
Thanks,
Mike
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/17/2009 12:10 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>> The following lines have been removed:
>>>>>
>>>>> CPU: Physical Processor ID:
>>>>> CPU: Processor Core ID:
>>>>> CPU %d/0x%x -> Node %d
>>>> please don't.
>>>>
>>> Why not?
>>>
>>> Or, more formally: please state the rationale for keeping them.
>>>
>> at least one distribution: SLES 11 mess it up when BSP is from socket
>> 1 instead of socket0
>>
>> and above message does show kernel think BSP still from socket0, and
>> other cores in that package are from socket1.
>
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 256K
> CPU: L3 cache: 24576K
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffc07129b0
> IP: [<ffffffff8049494b>] init_intel+0xea/0x14b
> PGD 203067 PUD 204067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [1] SMP
> last sysfs file:
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in:
> Supported: Yes
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27.19-5-default #1
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8049494b>] [<ffffffff8049494b>] init_intel+0xea/0x14b
> RSP: 0018:ffffffff80965f48 EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000020000000 RBX: 0000000000000044 RCX: 00000000000001a0
> RDX: ffffffff808cbd14 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 0000000020000000
> RBP: 0000000020000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 000000000000000a R11: ffffffff802223f1 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff80a40080(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: ffffffffc07129b0 CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 00000000000006a0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffffffff80964000, task ffffffff806da380)
> Stack: 0000000100000003 0000000100000000 ffffffff808cbd00 ffffe20000000000
> 0000007800000000 ffffffff804943ef 0000000000000000 ffffffff80974fda
> 0000000000000000 ffffffff8096de10 0000000000000000 ffffffff809a1510
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff804943ef>] identify_cpu+0x3c/0xa3
> [<ffffffff80974fda>] check_bugs+0x9/0x2e
> [<ffffffff8096de10>] start_kernel+0x313/0x324
> [<ffffffff8096d38f>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xde/0xe4
>
>
> Code: 0f a2 a8 1f 74 07 c1 e8 1a ff c0 eb 05 b8 01 00 00 00 66 89 85 d8 00 00 00
> 65 44 8b 24 25 24 00 00 00 e8 c3 66 d8 ff 89 c5 48 98 <0f> bf 9c 00 b0 29 71 80
> 83 fb ff 74 0d 0f a3 1d 91 a1 4c 00 19
> RIP [<ffffffff8049494b>] init_intel+0xea/0x14b
> RSP <ffffffff80965f48>
> CR2: ffffffffc07129b0
> ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
>
>
> 2.6.32 kernel corresponding part:
>
> [ 0.128855] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> [ 0.129856] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> [ 0.130845] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> [ 0.151454] CPU: L2 cache: 256K
> [ 0.152463] CPU: L3 cache: 24576K
> [ 0.153471] CPU 0/0x20 -> Node 0
> [ 0.168552] CPU 0 microcode level: 0xffff0008
> [ 0.169901] mce: CPU supports 22 MCE banks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-18 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 19:17 [PATCH 0/5] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-17 20:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-17 20:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-17 21:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-18 2:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-18 17:44 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-11-18 17:43 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 21:05 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-18 10:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-11-18 17:18 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-18 18:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration " Mike Travis
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-17 19:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-18 0:22 [PATCH 0/5] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-18 0:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-18 2:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-18 17:43 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-26 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B043298.1010208@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox