Re: [PATCH 4/5] pata: Update experimental tags

Sergei Shtylyov
2009-11-19T21:21:49Z

Hello.

Alan Cox wrote:

>> I'd suggest to address the delay by another, separate patch to both
>> pata_hpt37x and pata_hpt3x2n drivers, and accept Bart's original patch for
>> bit reversing...
>>
>
> If you can confirm the 371N is fine without switching to I/O cycles then
>

HPT371N datasheet says that the SRC1/2 registers are dual-mapped to
PCI and I/O space. Are you paranoid enough to want me to test the
drivers on the board with HPT371N too? :-)

> I agree entirely with that and I'll push the udelay(10) into all three
>

I can't say anything about pata_hpt36x, I don't think I have HPT
drivers that old...

> plus the drivers/ide one unless Bart beats me to it.
>

I could beat you to it as well. :-)

> Alan

WBR, Sergei