linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, andi@firstfloor.org, roland@redhat.com,
	rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] jump label v3 - x86: Introduce generic jump	patching without stop_machine
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:11:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B073E59.2000808@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091119002826.GB28962@Krystal>

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Jason Baron (jbaron@redhat.com) wrote:
>> Add text_poke_fixup() which takes a fixup address to where a processor
>> jumps if it hits the modifying address while code modifying.
>> text_poke_fixup() does following steps for this purpose.
>>
>>   1. Setup int3 handler for fixup.
>>   2. Put a breakpoint (int3) on the first byte of modifying region,
>>      and synchronize code on all CPUs.
>>   3. Modify other bytes of modifying region, and synchronize code on all CPUs.
>>   4. Modify the first byte of modifying region, and synchronize code
>>      on all CPUs.
>>   5. Clear int3 handler.
>>
>
> Hi Masami,
>
> I like the approach and the API is clean. I have intersped comments
> below.
>
> Ingo: I raise a question about text_mutex vs on_each_cpu hangs I
> experienced recently in the message below. Might be worth having a look,
> I suspect this might have caused the hangs Paul McKenney had with his
> past TREE RCU callback migration. I think he did take a mutex in the cpu
> hotplug callbacks and might have used IPIs within that same lock.

Hi Mathieu,

I guess that the hang might happen as below;

----
lock text_mutex
modify code
on_each_cpu(do_something)
                               cpu-hotplug (down)
                               lock cpu-hotplug mutex
                               online_cpus is changed
                               native_cpu_die()
                               ->alternatives_smp_switch(0)
                                 ->lock text_mutex -> sleep
(wait for offlined cpu...)
----

If this is correct, I think we can fix it as below.

----
lock cpu-hotplug mutex
lock text_mutex
modify code
on_each_cpu(do_something)
unlock text_mutex
unlock cpu-hotplug mutex
                               cpu-hotplug (down)
                               lock cpu-hotplug mutex
                               online_cpus is changed
                               native_cpu_die()
                               ->alternatives_smp_switch(0)
                                 ->lock text_mutex
                                   modify code
                                   unlock text_mutex
                               ...
                               unlock cpu-hotplug mutex
----
Or,
----
lock text_mutex
modify code
unlock text_mutex
on_each_cpu(do_something)
                               cpu-hotplug (down)
                               lock cpu-hotplug mutex
                               online_cpus is changed
                               native_cpu_die()
                               ->alternatives_smp_switch(0)
                                 ->lock text_mutex
                                   modify code
                                   unlock text_mutex
                               ...
                               unlock cpu-hotplug mutex
----
The latter needs another mutex for int3 handler and
frequently mutex_lock/unlock in this patch.

Hmm?

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-21  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-18 22:43 [RFC PATCH 0/6] jump label v3 Jason Baron
2009-11-18 22:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] jump label v3 - kprobes/x86: Cleanup RELATIVEJUMP_INSTRUCTION to RELATIVEJUMP_OPCODE Jason Baron
2009-11-18 22:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] jump label v3 - x86: Introduce generic jump patching without stop_machine Jason Baron
2009-11-19  0:28   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-19  0:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-19  1:22       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19  1:39         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-19  1:57       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-19  4:16         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-19 14:04     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-19 16:03       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-20  1:00         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-21 15:32           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-21  1:11     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2009-11-21 15:38       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-20 21:54   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-21  0:06     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-21  0:19       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-21 16:21       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-21 21:55         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-22  1:46           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-21 16:12     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-18 22:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] jump label v3 - move opcode defs Jason Baron
2009-11-18 22:43 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] jump label v3 - base patch Jason Baron
2009-11-18 23:38   ` [PATCH] notifier atomic call chain notrace Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-11-19  0:02     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-19  3:59     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-19 16:48     ` Jason Baron
2009-11-18 22:43 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] jump label v3 - add module support Jason Baron
2009-11-18 22:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] jump label v3 - tracepoint support Jason Baron
2009-11-18 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] jump label v3 H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-18 23:07   ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-18 23:18     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19  3:54 ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-19 21:55   ` Jason Baron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B073E59.2000808@redhat.com \
    --to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).