From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
awalls@radix.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managed workqueue, take#3
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:33:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0BE0A0.5030703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258993624-28735-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On 11/23/2009 06:26 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> This patchset is the third take of prep-for-concurrent-managed-wq
> patchset.
>
The kvm and sched_notifier changes are fine as far as I'm concerned.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-24 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 16:26 [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] sched, kvm: fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] workqueue: Add debugobjects support Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] sched: rename preempt_notifier to sched_notifier and always enable it Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] sched: update sched_notifier and add wakeup/sleep notifications Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() and implement try_to_wake_up_local() Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] sched: implement force_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:27 ` [PATCH 10/14] workqueue: merge feature parameters into flags Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:27 ` [PATCH 11/14] workqueue: update cwq alignement and make one more flag bit available Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:27 ` [PATCH 12/14] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:27 ` [PATCH 13/14] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2009-11-23 16:27 ` [PATCH 14/14] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2009-11-24 13:33 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-11-25 7:38 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0BE0A0.5030703@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=awalls@radix.net \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox