linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Anders Kaseorg <andersk@ksplice.com>,
	Tim Abbott <tabbott@ksplice.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
	systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
	DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v5 00/10] kprobes: Kprobes jump optimization support
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:06:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0C0469.2020903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091124075249.GC21991@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:03:19AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:21:16PM -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>>>   When the optimized-kprobe is hit before optimization, its handler
>>>>  changes IP(instruction pointer) to copied code and exits. So, the
>>>>  instructions which were copied to detour buffer are executed on the detour
>>>>  buffer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hm, why is it playing such hybrid game there?
>>> If I understand well, we have executed int 3, executed the
>>> handler and we jump back to the detour buffer?
>>>
>>
>> I got it, I think. We have instructions to patch. And the above turn 
>> this area into dead code, safe to patch.
>>
>> But still, stop_machine() seem to make it not necessary anymore.
> 
> i think 'sending an IPI to all online CPUs' might be an adequate 
> sequence to make sure patching effects have propagated. I.e. an 
> smp_call_function() with a dummy function?

Hmm, I assume that you mean waiting for all int3 handler.

We have to separate below issues:
 - int3-based multi-bytes code replacement
 - multi-instruction replacement with int3-detour code

The former is implemented on patch 9/10 and 10/10. As you can see,
these patches are RFC status, because I'd like to wait for official
reply of safeness from processor architects.
And it may be able to use a dummy IPI for 2nd IPI because it
just for waiting int3 interrupts. But again, it is just estimated that
replacing with/recovering from int3 is automatically synchronized...

However, at least stop_machine() method is officially described
at "7.1.3 Handling Self- and Cross-Modifying Code" on the intel's
software developer's manual 3A . So currently we can use it.

For the latter issue, as I explained on previous reply, we need
to wait all running interrupts including hardware interrupts.
Thus I used synchronize_sched().

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com


      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-24 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-23 23:21 [PATCH -tip v5 00/10] kprobes: Kprobes jump optimization support Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:21 ` [PATCH -tip v5 01/10] kprobes/x86: Cleanup RELATIVEJUMP_INSTRUCTION to RELATIVEJUMP_OPCODE Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:21 ` [PATCH -tip v5 02/10] kprobes: Introduce generic insn_slot framework Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:21 ` [PATCH -tip v5 03/10] kprobes: Introduce kprobes jump optimization Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24  2:44   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24  3:31     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 15:34       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24 20:14         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 20:59           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-25 21:08             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-25 21:30               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24 21:08           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-24 15:34     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24 19:45       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 21:15         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:21 ` [PATCH -tip v5 04/10] kprobes: Jump optimization sysctl interface Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:21 ` [PATCH -tip v5 05/10] kprobes/x86: Boost probes when reentering Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:22 ` [PATCH -tip v5 06/10] kprobes/x86: Cleanup save/restore registers Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24  2:51   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 15:39     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24 20:19       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 15:40     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-11-24 20:20       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-23 23:22 ` [PATCH -tip v5 07/10] kprobes/x86: Support kprobes jump optimization on x86 Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24  3:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 16:27   ` Jason Baron
2009-11-24 17:46     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-25 16:12       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24 16:35   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-24 17:00     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:22 ` [PATCH -tip v5 08/10] kprobes: Add documents of jump optimization Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:22 ` [PATCH -tip v5 09/10] [RFC] x86: Introduce generic jump patching without stop_machine Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-23 23:22 ` [PATCH -tip v5 10/10] [RFC] kprobes/x86: Use text_poke_fixup() for jump optimization Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-24  2:03 ` [PATCH -tip v5 00/10] kprobes: Kprobes jump optimization support Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24  3:20   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24  7:52     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 16:06       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B0C0469.2020903@redhat.com \
    --to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=andersk@ksplice.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=tabbott@ksplice.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).