From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760168AbZKZJQI (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:16:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760147AbZKZJQH (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:16:07 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:43885 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760066AbZKZJQE (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:16:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4B0E4741.10509@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:15:45 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ko-KR; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 SUSE/3.0b4-3.6 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree References: <20091126190018.88a6dd77.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091126081237.GA31034@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20091126081237.GA31034@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 11/26/2009 05:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Please submit scheduler patches to the scheduler tree. Such level of > refactoring of a critical scheduler component needs to go through the > regular scheduler channels. This is a frequently modified piece of code > and conflicts are likely in the future. Sure, which sched/* branch should I base these patches on? Alternatively, pulling the following branch into one of sched/* should do the trick too. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git for-sched Thanks. -- tejun