From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
Martin Olsson <martin@minimum.se>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Codingstyle: allow omitting braces for all single statement branches
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:11:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0EA8B0.10703@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259227618-1466-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Grepping for "} else$" in v2.6.32-rc8 yields 6440 hits. So this seems
> to be common practice and should be allowed.
Flawed reasoning. Is this in new and otherwise stylistically
well-written code? Or did you perhaps grep in old code or even in staging?
> checkpatch doesn't warn about both variants.
What checkpatch does/ can do, or doesn't, is only indirectly related to
good style or canonical style.
> --- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> @@ -168,15 +168,23 @@ Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
> if (condition)
> action();
>
> -This does not apply if one branch of a conditional statement is a single
> -statement. Use braces in both branches.
> -
> -if (condition) {
> - do_this();
> - do_that();
> -} else {
> - otherwise();
> -}
> +If not all branches of a conditional statement are single statements you might
> +use braces for both branches.
> +
> + if (condition) {
> + do_this();
> + do_that();
> + } else
> + otherwise();
> +
> +or
> +
> + if (condition) {
> + do_this();
> + do_that();
> + } else {
> + otherwise();
> + }
>
> 3.1: Spaces
>
Either don't remove the existing paragraph, or remove it --- but do not
add your new either-or paragraph. If you consider both variants to be
OK, you don't need to bloat the style guide by documenting them both.
There is no third or fourth alternative.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= =-== ==-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-26 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-26 9:26 [PATCH RFC] Codingstyle: allow omitting braces for all single statement branches Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-26 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-26 16:11 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0EA8B0.10703@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@minimum.se \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=tlikonen@iki.fi \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox