From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754213AbZK0Jmi (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:42:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753135AbZK0Jmh (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:42:37 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:36153 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752596AbZK0Jmg (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:42:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4B0F9F0D.6010601@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:42:37 +0100 From: Michal Marek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 SUSE/3.0b4-5.3 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Sam Ravnborg , =?ISO-8859-2?Q?An=EDbal_Monsalve_?= =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Salazar?= , Andrew Morton , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, lkml Subject: Re: linux-kbuild.git References: <4B0E73E1.50900@suse.cz> <20091126193750.GA15453@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20091127152211.55043dbb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20091127152211.55043dbb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27.11.2009 05:22, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:37:50 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:26:09PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: >>> >>> I went through the patches posted to linux-kbuild and picked those that >>> were easy enough to review, looked safe and worked for me. I also took >>> Sam's series from kbuild-next.git, but I didn't really review it yet, so >>> there is no signoff from me (TBD). The repo is at >>> >>> git://repo.or.cz/linux-kbuild.git for-next >> >> Looks good. >> Good to see you picked up some of the patches that were pending. >> >> Stephen - please replace my kbuild trees with this. > > I have replaced this from today. Thanks! > Do you intend to run the equivalent of > the kbuild-current tree (bug fixes for the current release while they are > waiting to go to Linus)? I have removed the kbuild-current tree for now > since the only commit in it is in the new kbuild tree. I plan to maintain such a branch, but I thought I would base the for-next branch on top of it, so that you get everything in one pack. Or would you still prefer to have two kbuild branches in linux-next, so that you can remove the for-next branch if necessary and keep the for-current branch? Just tell me what fits you best. > Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As > you may know, this is not a judgment of your code. The purpose of > linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of > conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. > > You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have > been: > * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's > Signed-off-by, > * posted to the relevant mailing list, > * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), > * successfully unit tested, and > * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. OK, will keep that in mind. Michal