public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: WARNING: kernel/smp.c:292 smp_call_function_single [Was: mmotm 2009-11-24-16-47 uploaded]
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:58:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B138950.9040905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B1113C0.30505@redhat.com>

Hello,

On 11/28/2009 09:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Hmm, commit 498657a moved the fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers() call
>> into the irqs disabled section recently.
>>
>>      sched, kvm: Fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers
>>
>>      In finish_task_switch(), fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers() is
>>      called after finish_lock_switch().
>>
>>      However, depending on architecture, preemption can be enabled after
>>      finish_lock_switch() which breaks the semantics of preempt
>>      notifiers.
>>
>>      So move it before finish_arch_switch(). This also makes the in-
>>      notifiers symmetric to out- notifiers in terms of locking - now
>>      both are called under rq lock.
>>
>> It's not a surprise that this breaks the existing code which does the
>> smp function call.
> 
> Yes, kvm expects preempt notifiers to be run with irqs enabled.  Copying
> patch author.

Hmmm... then, it's broken both ways.  The previous code may get
preempted after scheduling but before the notifier is run (which
breaks the semantics of the callback horribly), the current code
doesn't satisfy kvm's requirement.  Another thing is that in the
previous implementation the context is different between the 'in' and
'out' callbacks, which is subtle and nasty.  Can kvm be converted to
not do smp calls directly?

For the time being, maybe it's best to back out the fix given that the
only architecture which may be affected by the original bug is ia64
which is the only one with both kvm and the unlocked context switch.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-30  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-25  0:47 mmotm 2009-11-24-16-47 uploaded akpm
2009-11-25 15:12 ` BUG at scsi_lib.c:1108 [Was: mmotm 2009-11-24-16-47 uploaded] Jiri Slaby
2009-11-25 15:19   ` James Bottomley
2009-11-25 20:22     ` Jiri Slaby
2009-11-25 21:13       ` Neil Brown
2009-11-26 10:17         ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-27  4:17         ` Neil Brown
2009-11-27 10:20           ` Jiri Slaby
2009-11-26  1:46 ` mmotm 2009-11-24-16-47 uploaded (gpio_max7301) Randy Dunlap
2009-11-28 16:21   ` Wolfram Sang
2009-12-15 22:43   ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-15 22:46     ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-15 23:10       ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-16 11:30         ` Wolfram Sang
2009-11-27 10:33 ` ugly sound output (intel-hda) [was: mmotm 2009-11-24-16-47 uploaded] Jiri Slaby
2009-11-27 10:45   ` Takashi Iwai
2009-11-27 11:07     ` Jiri Slaby
2009-11-27 11:18       ` Takashi Iwai
2009-11-27 12:22         ` Jiri Slaby
2009-11-27 12:26           ` Takashi Iwai
2009-11-27 15:03 ` WARNING: kernel/smp.c:292 smp_call_function_single [Was: " Jiri Slaby
2009-11-27 15:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-27 16:37     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-27 16:44       ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-28 12:12       ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-30  8:58         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-11-30  9:41           ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-30 10:02           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-30 10:45             ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-30 11:02               ` [PATCH tip/sched/urgent] sched: revert 498657a478c60be092208422fefa9c7b248729c2 Tejun Heo
2009-11-30 11:13                 ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B138950.9040905@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox