From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753486AbZK3Jpz (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:45:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752374AbZK3Jpz (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:45:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1164 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752102AbZK3Jpy (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:45:54 -0500 Message-ID: <4B13942E.3000002@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:45:18 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-3.9.b4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Ingo Molnar , lkml , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32-rc6] sched, kvm: fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers References: <4AFD2801.7020900@kernel.org> <20091113095516.GD1364@elte.hu> <4AFEAB6D.60600@redhat.com> <4B138BC8.3090008@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4B138BC8.3090008@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/30/2009 11:09 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> >>> but we want to do sched.c changes via >>> the scheduler tree. >>> > So, this one was a bust. Given that the only platform which might > have been affected by the original bug is ia64 and it's very unlikely > to happen. I think reverting this from sched/urgent would be the > right thing to do at this point if the branch is headed for another > push to Linus. Avi, what do you think? > I agree. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function