public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Always set prefetchable base/limit upper32 registers
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:22:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1461CB.2070000@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259625224.8949.319.camel@8530w.home>

Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:32 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:12 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> Alex Williamson wrote: 
>>>>> I don't believe the PCI spec dictates whether the upper 32bit base
>>>>> should be 0 or -1, so it's purely a BIOS initialization choice and Linux
>>>>> should properly handle both.  If the hardware only supports 32bit
>>>>> prefetchable windows, the hardware will drop the write, just as it did
>>>>> for every 2.6 kernel before 1f82de10.  Thanks,
>>>> current code:
>>>>
>>>> #define  PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_MASK 0x0fUL
>>>> #define  PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_32 0x00     
>>>> #define  PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 0x01
>>>> #define  PCI_PREF_RANGE_MASK    (~0x0fUL)
>>>>
>>>> if the HW state the pref mmio is 64bit, we will touch upper 32bit. otherwise we will not touch it.
>>> Really, where?  Please paste the code that writes to
>>> PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32 in the case of hardware supporting a 64bit
>>> prefetchable window.  I only see this happening if we are assigning it
>>> to an IORESOURCE_MEM_64 resources.
>> IORESOURCE_MEM_64 get set when PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 is set.
>>
>> in probe.c::pci_read_bridge_bases()
> 
> Ah, I think I see where you're going.  We only set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 if
> base <= limit, ie. the BIOS has programmed the prefetchable range.  This
> is not a requirement by the PCI spec.  In my case the BIOS has left base
>> limit, just as Linux would do if it disabled the range, so we never
> set this flag.
> 
>> setup-bus.c::pci_bridge_check_ranges()
> 
> This is only checking that the upper 32bits is actually implemented,
> should we have already set the IORESOURCE_MEM_64 from the function
> above, which we haven't.  
> 
> So, in my case I have a 64bit capable prefetchable range, that the BIOS
> has not programmed and is not required to program.  We assign it to a
> 32bit window, and never touch the UPPER32 registers.

are you using 32bit kernel?

YH

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-01  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-30 21:22 [PATCH] PCI: Always set prefetchable base/limit upper32 registers Alex Williamson
2009-11-30 21:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-30 21:43   ` Alex Williamson
2009-11-30 21:52     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-30 22:01       ` Alex Williamson
2009-11-30 22:12         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-30 22:19           ` Alex Williamson
2009-11-30 23:32             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-30 23:53               ` Alex Williamson
2009-12-01  0:00                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01  1:56                   ` Alex Williamson
2009-12-01  2:26                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01  2:50                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01  3:23                         ` Alex Williamson
2009-12-01  6:35                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01  6:55                             ` Alex Williamson
2009-12-01  7:03                             ` [PATCH] pci: fix bridge 64bit flag setting Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01 15:38                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-12-01 18:28                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01 19:15                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01  0:22                 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-12-01  0:00               ` [PATCH] PCI: Always set prefetchable base/limit upper32 registers Grant Grundler
2009-12-01  0:09                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01  0:15                   ` Grant Grundler
2009-11-30 23:58       ` Grant Grundler
2009-11-30 21:42 ` Grant Grundler
2009-11-30 21:43   ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B1461CB.2070000@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@hp.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox