From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Always set prefetchable base/limit upper32 registers
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:23:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B146FF6.9090307@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091201001942.GF24539@lackof.org>
Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 05:03:32PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:51:44PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> Prior to 1f82de10 we always initialized the upper 32bits of the
>>> prefetchable memory window, regardless of the address range used.
>>> Now we only touch it for a >32bit address, which means the upper32
>>> registers remain whatever the BIOS initialized them too.
>>>
>>> It's valid for the BIOS to set the upper32 base/limit to
>>> 0xffffffff/0x00000000, which makes us program prefetchable ranges
>>> like 0xffffffffabc00000 - 0x00000000abc00000
>>>
>>> Revert the chunk of 1f82de10 that made this conditional so we always
>>> write the upper32 registers and remove now unused pref_mem64 variable.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
>
> NAK this - I messed up. Yinghai is correct. Something else is going on.
>
> It might be perfectly OK to read 0xffffffffabc00000 if the bridge
> isn't using the upper32 Prefetchable register. Maybe the problem is
> some code is reading the upper32 value without checking that it's valid?
maybe Alex is using old lspci?
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-01 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-30 21:51 [PATCH v2] PCI: Always set prefetchable base/limit upper32 registers Alex Williamson
2009-12-01 0:03 ` Grant Grundler
2009-12-01 0:19 ` Grant Grundler
2009-12-01 1:23 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-12-01 4:10 ` Alex Williamson
2009-12-01 19:55 ` Grant Grundler
2009-12-01 20:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-01 20:59 ` Grant Grundler
2009-12-01 21:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-05 0:01 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-05 14:49 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B146FF6.9090307@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox