From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, npiggin@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/locking] locking, x86: Slightly shorten __ticket_spin_trylock()
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:23:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B16A2A5.2030307@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912020857270.2872@localhost.localdomain>
On 12/02/2009 09:05 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Btw, even if gcc just treats 'bool' as 'char' (which is the sane thing to
> do on x86 anyway - I don't see why it should ever do anything else), we
> actually mess up in the kernel and make that type confusion even worse.
>
For what it's worth, the gcc ABI for i386-Linux treats _Bool (bool) as
follows:
When in memory, except stack slots:
sizeof(_Bool) = 1
0 is false, 1 is true, any other value is *undefined behavior*.
When in registers, or in a stack slot:
Registers, and stack slots, are always 4 bytes
0 is false, 1 is true, any other value is *undefined behavior*.
All of which is well-defined. However, it also only applies to values
in memory, or values passed across function boundaries in registers[1]
-- anything else is *by definition outside the scope of the ABI* and
therefore the compiler can legitimately do whatever is appropriate at
any point in time.
As such, I would agree with Linus in that using an u8 is the right thing
to be handed through the inline asm boundary -- if the compiler needs to
extend it, it will, and if it doesn't, there is no penalty. Similarly,
a bool can be cast to u8 without penalty.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-02 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-27 15:09 [PATCH] x86: slightly shorten __ticket_spin_trylock() Jan Beulich
2009-12-02 10:45 ` [tip:core/locking] locking, x86: Slightly " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
2009-12-02 13:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:06 ` Jan Beulich
2009-12-02 14:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-02 14:25 ` Jan Beulich
2009-12-02 14:36 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-02 14:59 ` Jan Beulich
2009-12-02 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:57 ` Jan Beulich
2009-12-02 15:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-02 15:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-02 16:24 ` Jan Beulich
2009-12-02 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-02 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-02 17:23 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-12-02 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-02 17:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B16A2A5.2030307@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox