public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, stable@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: timer must be setup unconditionally
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:31:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1722FD.3080807@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B1638FE0200007800022FC2@vpn.id2.novell.com>

Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> 02.12.09 09:47 >>>
>> Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> mce_timer must be passed to setup_timer() in all cases, no matter
>>> whether it is going to be actually used. Otherwise, when the CPU gets
>>> brought down, its call to del_timer_sync() will never return, as the
>>> timer won't have a base associated, and hence lock_timer_base() will
>>> loop infinitely.
>> No, what we need to fix is hotplug callbacks.
>> So correct fix should be like "del/add timer conditionally when hotplug."
> 
> Why? This makes the logic just more complicated (you'd need to track
> whether the timer was ever setup or added), and I can't see any
> non-tolerable side effect of calling setup_timer() without ever adding
> the timer anywhere.

Ah, sorry, I mistook your patch.
It seems that I just found an another bug here...

Reviewed-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>


Thanks,
H.Seto


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-03  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-02  7:50 [PATCH] x86/mce: timer must be setup unconditionally Jan Beulich
2009-12-02  8:47 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-02  8:53   ` Jan Beulich
2009-12-03  2:31     ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2009-12-08  2:21 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-08  3:14   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-08  3:33     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-08  3:44     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-08 11:31   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Set up timer unconditionally tip-bot for Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B1722FD.3080807@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox