From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, wcohen@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, jbaron@redhat.com,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:51:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B17C25A.8090703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259813228.12870.108.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 23:00 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> In addition, I wonder if we should rename "CREATE_TRACE_POINTS" to
>>> something more suitable while we are here ? Basically, it will affect
>>> all TRACE_CLASS/TRACE_CLASS_EVENT/TRACE_EVENT from headers included
>>> after it's defined.
>>
>> Agreed, CREATE_TRACE_POINTS is a bit irritating thing :-(
>
> Well, I think the name could use some help, but I don't think it is the
> name that irritates you.
Yes :-)
>> For example, if we call tracepoints defined in same-header on
>> several different files, we need to check other people have
>> already defined CREATE_TRACE_POINTS on another file, because
>> CREATE_TRACE_POINTS must be used once for each header...
>>
>> So, how about introducing a c file which is only for defining
>> tracepoints for kernel parts ? or defining tracepoints in
>> kernel at the beginning of kernel/tracepoint.c ? (and don't
>> touch tracepoints in modules)
>
> I think the proper fix is to have each tracepoint header have its own C
> file. I believe Christoph does this with xfs.
>
> Basically, we should have a:
>
> kernel/sched_trace.c that includes the include/trace/events/sched.h and
> does the define.
>
> And the same goes for other trace points.
Hmm, I'd rather like to move it into kernel/events/ or something new
sub directory, since those files will have just two lines (define and
include).
>> e.g.
>>
>> @kernel/tracepoint.c
>> ...
>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> #include <trace/events/sched.h>
>> #include <trace/events/...>
>
> We could do this for all that is defined in the include/trace/events.
>
>> ...
>>
>> @kernel/sched.c
>> ...
>> #include <trace/events/sched.h> /* Just include events header */
>> ...
>>
>> @fs/ext4/super.c (no change, since it can be module)
>> ...
>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> #include <trace/events/ext4.h>
>
> Perhaps we should move out anything in include/trace/events that is also
> a module into its sub system?
Would you mean putting those headers in sub-system's directory?
(e.g. fs/ext4/)
In that case, a problem will happen when user want to hook those
tracepoint from their module, because it is hard to find those
local headers.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-01 17:18 [PATCH v2] tracing: add DEFINE_EVENT(), DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT() support to docbook Jason Baron
2009-12-01 17:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 10:42 ` [tip:perf/core] tracing: Add " tip-bot for Jason Baron
2009-12-02 13:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 14:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 14:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 16:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 16:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 17:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 18:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 18:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 19:01 ` trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 19:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 19:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 22:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 22:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 22:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-02 23:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-02 23:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 3:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 23:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 4:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 4:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 13:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2009-12-03 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 14:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 14:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 14:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 15:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 15:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 16:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 20:11 ` [PATCH][tip/perf/core] tracing: Rename TRACE_EVENT and others to something resonable Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 20:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B17C25A.8090703@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox