public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/31] Constify struct super_operations for 2.6.32 v1
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:23:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1BBE71.70305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6fcc0a0912052114v790f04c9h9a7367ff74d12426@mail.gmail.com>

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> -   	struct inode *(*alloc_inode)(struct super_block *sb);
>> +   	struct inode *(* const alloc_inode)(struct super_block *sb);
> 
> Good rule is if adding const doesn't move object from one section
> to another, it isn't worth it.
> 
> I suggest we stick to it or risk another wave of jumbo patches.
> 
If all instances of a given ops structure are const and we would like to
preserve this policy for the future as well, then  it is very useful
to give future programmers a strong hint about this policy by making
the compiler complain about any violation attempts. Otherwise they may
very well write code that modifies such structures and we will have to
work extra to undo that (or change the policy but in that case it is
good to know why we have to do that).
--
Emese

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-06 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-06  5:14 [PATCH 28/31] Constify struct super_operations for 2.6.32 v1 Alexey Dobriyan
2009-12-06 14:23 ` Emese Revfy [this message]
2009-12-07 18:30   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-12-08  0:06     ` Emese Revfy
2009-12-08  1:51       ` Al Viro
2009-12-09  0:24         ` Emese Revfy
2009-12-09  0:47           ` Al Viro
2009-12-09  8:22             ` Olivier Galibert
2009-12-10 18:24             ` Emese Revfy
2009-12-09  1:31 ` Ralf Baechle
2009-12-09  1:45   ` Al Viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-04 22:00 [PATCH 00/31] constify various _ops structures " Emese Revfy
2009-12-04 22:47 ` [PATCH 28/31] Constify struct super_operations " Emese Revfy
2009-12-06  1:23   ` Al Viro
2009-12-06  1:41     ` Emese Revfy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B1BBE71.70305@gmail.com \
    --to=re.emese@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox